Answer:
And in the figure attached we see the limits with the percentages associated.
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case we know that the random variable of interest is the scores on a test given to all juniors in a school district follows a normal distribution with the following parameters:
For this case we know from the empirical rule that within one deviation from the mean we have approximately 68.2% of the data, within 2 deviations from the mean we have 95% and within 3 deviation 99.7%
We can find the limits and we got:
And in the figure attached we see the limits with the percentages associated.
Answer:
D. $56
Step-by-step explanation:
Sandra's taxable income is $39,250.
That amount works for range 2 ($39,250 - $39,300), so her tax is $5,944.
Sandra paid $6,000 in FWT (federal withholding tax), which is greater than $5,944, so we need the refund here.
Subtract 5,944 from 6,000 to get the refund.
6,000 - 5,944
We can go on ahead and just make this 100 - 44 (5,900 - 5,900 = 0).
100 - 44
Her refund is $56.
Answer:
lol 60 because there is a 40% chance out of 100% because its chances and not like a store! its chances so its 100% not productivity which leads to an infinite number
This can be calculated using the formula:
P = L((r/n)*(1 + r/n)^(n*t))/((1 + r/n)^(n*t) - 1)
Where:
L = 4759
r = 0.209
n = 12
t = 3
So plugging in our data:P = 4759((0.209/12)*(1 + 0.209/12)^(12*3))/((1 + 0.209/12)^(12*3) - 1)
Which will give us the amount of: $179.05 is the monthly repayments.
Other info:
Total interest:$1,686.80
Total cost:$6,445.80
