Answer:
Part 1)
-------> 
Part 2)
--------> 
Part 3)
------> 
Part 4)
------> 
Step-by-step explanation:
Part 1) we have

To calculate the division problem convert the decimal number to fraction number
so

Remember that
Since division is the opposite of multiplication, you can turn this division problem into a multiplication problem by multiplying the top fraction by the reciprocal of the bottom fraction

Simplify
Divide by 22 both numerator and denominator

Part 2) we have

To calculate the division problem convert the mixed number to an improper fraction

so

Since division is the opposite of multiplication, you can turn this division problem into a multiplication problem by multiplying the top fraction by the reciprocal of the bottom fraction

Convert to mixed number

Part 3) we have

Since division is the opposite of multiplication, you can turn this division problem into a multiplication problem by multiplying the top fraction by the reciprocal of the bottom fraction

Simplify
Divide by 5 both numerator and denominator

Part 4) we have

To calculate the division problem convert the mixed number to an improper fraction

so

Since division is the opposite of multiplication, you can turn this division problem into a multiplication problem by multiplying the top fraction by the reciprocal of the bottom fraction

Honestly I don’t remember how to do this but u can try .083 but don’t count on it
Equations don't have minimum or maximum, functions do.
Function y=2n^2+5n-25 has minimum -28.125, has no maximum.
Answer:
This is trapezium.
Area of this figure =1/2h(d1-d2)
1/2×5(14-8)
=30/2
=15cm^2
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello!
The objective of this experiment is to test if two different foam-expanding agents have the same foam expansion capacity
Sample 1 (aqueous film forming foam)
n₁= 5
X[bar]₁= 4.7
S₁= 0.6
Sample 2 (alcohol-type concentrates )
n₂= 5
X[bar]₂= 6.8
S₂= 0.8
Both variables have a normal distribution and σ₁²= σ₂²= σ²= ?
The statistic to use to make the estimation and the hypothesis test is the t-statistic for independent samples.:
t= ![\frac{(X[bar]_1 - X[bar]_2) - (mu_1 - mu_2)}{Sa*\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2 } } }](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B%28X%5Bbar%5D_1%20-%20X%5Bbar%5D_2%29%20-%20%28mu_1%20-%20mu_2%29%7D%7BSa%2A%5Csqrt%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn_1%7D%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn_2%20%7D%20%7D%20%7D)
a) 95% CI
(X[bar]_1 - X[bar]_2) ±
*
Sa²=
=
= 0.5
Sa= 0.707ç

(4.7-6.9) ± 2.306* 
[-4.78; 0.38]
With a 95% confidence level you expect that the interval [-4.78; 0.38] will contain the population mean of the expansion capacity of both agents.
b.
The hypothesis is:
H₀: μ₁ - μ₂= 0
H₁: μ₁ - μ₂≠ 0
α: 0.05
The interval contains the cero, so the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.
<u>Complete question</u>
a. Find a 95% confidence interval on the difference in mean foam expansion of these two agents.
b. Based on the confidence interval, is there evidence to support the claim that there is no difference in mean foam expansion of these two agents?