1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sloan [31]
3 years ago
12

Some minority DULL shareholders objected strongly against a merging of the DULL and Exciting corporations, as they had been conv

inced that DULL's future was bright and would be worth far more once its current precarious financial situation was resolved. Now that the merger has been completed, despite their objections, what rights do these shareholders have
Law
1 answer:
galben [10]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Shareholders will have rights according to the  shareholder agreement that they would have entered into, merger terms between the companies and applicable government laws and rules.

Explanation:

However it has to be ensured that the majority shareholder even after merger will have the fiduciary duty towards the minority shareholder and that they shall ensure that all benefits and rights are being given to the minority shareholder and all acts of the majority shareholder are in good faith.

You might be interested in
How are all courts, except the US Supreme Court, established? A. by the Constitution B. by Congress C. by presidential executive
sesenic [268]
D. By the states. Is the answer
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was to be added for the Anti-Federalists to ratify
aivan3 [116]
Your mom house naps Manama with
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the role of the ACCC
ss7ja [257]

Answer:

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) is an independent Commonwealth statutory authority whose role is to enforce the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 and a range of additional legislation, promoting competition, fair trading and regulating national infrastructure for the benefit of all Australians.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How would a jury determine that a person had no control of themselves when they committed a crime?
Anna71 [15]

Answer:

I beleive the answer is C

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
HELP PLEASE :) PLEASE GET IT RIGHT
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

B. Supreme court Decisions are not limited by the Constitution.

Explanation:

The reason I say this is because the Supreme Court can completely overturn  a law without objection. They could simply say that something violates the constitution, and no one can stop them, which is why the Answer is B

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 12. What is the meaning of the supremacy clause?
    5·2 answers
  • If the police arrive at larry’s office without probable cause or a warrant and demand to search the premises, larry can
    14·1 answer
  • Alex was attending a party at his friend's house but there was nowhere to park so he parked across the street at Bentley's house
    5·1 answer
  • Benny was arrested by New York Police and charged with the armed robbery of a taxicab driver. While Benny was in jail waiting fo
    10·1 answer
  • What are the differences between legislation and case law?​
    14·1 answer
  • How does the concept of privity of contract apply to this situation?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following are congressional powers?
    12·1 answer
  • T/F The Supreme Court has ruled that the use of corporal punishment in schools (such as spanking) is a violation of the 14th and
    15·1 answer
  • Which is an example of a secondary source?
    14·1 answer
  • suppose a defendant is convicted at trial but believes that the judge made an error that impacted the decision.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!