The manufacturer Mike and Ike, the fruit-flavored chewy candies, has changed its packaging and developed contests all geared to
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
total rate of return on the Bond = 9.40%
Explanation:
given data
coupon bonds = 5.8%
bonds price = $1,030
maturity time = 14 year
required return on the bonds = 5.1 percent
solution
we know here market price of the bond is Present Value of Coupon Payments + Present face Value
so that face Valueof bond = $1,000
and here annual Coupon Amount will be
annual coupon amount = $1000 × 5.80%
annual coupon amount = $58
and here Market Price of the Bond will be
Market Price of Bond = Present Value of Coupon Payments + Present face Value ......................1
here Present Value of Coupon Payments at PVIFA 5.10% and 14 Years
Present Value Annuity Inflow Factor (PVIFA) = ....2
Present Value Annuity Inflow Factor =
Present Value Annuity Inflow Factor = 9.83566
and
Present Value Inflow Factor (PVIF) 5.10%, 14 Years= ...........3
Present Value Inflow Factor (PVIF) =
Present Value Inflow Factor = 0.49838
so
Market Price of Bond = ( $58 × 9.83566 ) + ( $1,000 × 0.49838 )
Market Price of Bond = $1,068.85
so total rate of return on the Bond will be
total rate of return on the Bond = [ { Annual Coupon Amount + ( Change in Bond Price ) } ÷ Current Price] ...............4
total rate of return on the Bond =
total rate of return on the Bond = 9.40%
Answer:
The answer is "choice a"
Explanation:
In the given question the missing choices is added in attached file please find it.
The additional output produced through hiring an extra item of such an input reflects the marginal product (MP). For the very first time. for example, its marginal labor productivity was increased output generated by recruiting additional work.
This law diminishing marginal returns as more as units that even the marginal result of even an input, that is hired input.
In other words, any additional work input would generate less than a previous employee because recruiting additional workers decreases expected revenue on jobs, the laid-off of employees, which means the Labor would grow expected revenue.
In Japan is laying off fewer employees even despite the slowdown it continues to produce strong outputs. The lower-priced revenues and their work remain constant along with their steady overall performance.
Your medium product (total) item divided by total work would stay intact. United states staff layover to the other side. It laid-off the staff equals higher marginal labor for overall returns it's going to be higher production besides that, lower labor in the United States could mean an increase in the gross labor output but a larger for Japan, more then, that's why the choice a is correct.
