Answer:
O Montresor is an unreliable narrator.
Explanation:
This passage is narrated in the first person. As we know, Montressor, the narrator, is an unbalanced man and crazy for revenge. In his conception Fortunato would never be able to understand what his plans were and why he acted the way he did, but we are not able to know if this is true, through the narration of Montressor.
As we only know his perception of what happens in history, we do not know what is real and what is invented, so we can say that he is not a reliable narrator.
In Emilio Gentile’s<span> ‘Politics as Religion,’ </span>Gentile describes the sacralising of Stalin’s regime in the following words:
<span>The sacralization of the party opened the way to the sacralization of Stalin when he became the supreme leader. After 1929, the political religion of Russia mainly concentrated on the deification of Stalin, who until his death in 1953 dominated the party and Soviet system like a tyrannical and merciless deity.</span>
Answer:
The main difference between past simple and past continuous tense is that:
- we use<u> past simple tense</u> when something happened at some time in past. We also commonly use this tense with past time adverbs (yesterday, last night, two days ago, etc.)
For example: John called his friend yesterday.
- we use <u>past continuous tense</u> if an action occurred in the past and <u>lasted for a period of time.</u>
Example: I was reading a book all day yesterday.
We used past continuous tense because the action of reading lasted for some time (a whole day in this case).
It would be cooler full but I don’t know if it’s a predictors or prey so if it’s colorful predators and not colerfull prey
