Ask question

Ask question

All categories

max2010maxim [7]

3 years ago

7

A car dealership decreased the price of a certain car by 4% . The original price was $43,600 . write the new price in terms of t

he original price.

1 answer:

defon3 years ago

6 0

Answer: The new price of the car is $41856

Step-by-step explanation:

So we know the the original price as 43,600 which is 100% and is being dropped by 4% so you would have to subtract 4% from a 100% and multiply it by the original price.

100% - 4% = 96%

Now 96% of the original price is the new price.

96% * 43,600= ?

0.96 * 43,600 = 41856

You might be interested in

What is the range of the relation below?

Ilya [14]

Answer:

b

Step-by-step explanation:

I had the same question

7 0

2 years ago

2. Find the lateral area and surface area of the<br> prism.<br> 4 cm<br> 5 cm<br> 4 cm<br> 3 cm

Vaselesa [24]

Answer:

Lateral = 48 cm squared and Surface area = 60 cm squared

Step-by-step explanation:

Lateral surface area = 4 x 4 + 5x4( Slope) + 4 x 3 (Cross section x2) = 48

Surface area: Lateral + 4x3(base)

4 0

2 years ago

How many distinct triangles can be formed for which m∠E = 64°, g = 9, and e = 10?

zysi [14]

Answer:

1) one

2) zero

Step-by-step explanation:

e/sinE = g/sinG

10/sin64 = 9/sinG

sinG = 0.8089146417

G = 53.99

j/sinJ = k/sinK

3/sin129 = 8/sinK

sinK = 2.072389241

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If tan 0 = -2.5, then cot 0 =<br> = ?

trapecia [35]

The answer shld be 0.99

4 0

3 years ago

Which series of transformations will not map figure H onto itself

7nadin3 [17]

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

Given a square with vertices at points (2,1), (1,2), (2,3) and (3,2).

Consider option A.

1st transformation $(x+0,y-2)$ will map vertices of the square into points

$(2,1)\rightarrow (2,-1);$
$(1,2)\rightarrow (1,0);$
$(2,3)\rightarrow (2,1);$
$(3,2)\rightarrow (3,0).$

2nd transformation = reflection over y = 1 has the rule (x,2-y). So,

$(2,-1)\rightarrow (2,3);$
$(1,0)\rightarrow (1,2);$
$(2,1)\rightarrow (2,1);$
$(3,0)\rightarrow (3,2)$

These points are exactly the vertices of the initial square.

Consider option B.

1st transformation $(x+2,y-0)$ will map vertices of the square into points

$(2,1)\rightarrow (4,1);$
$(1,2)\rightarrow (3,2);$
$(2,3)\rightarrow (4,3);$
$(3,2)\rightarrow (5,2).$

2nd transformation = reflection over x = 3 has the rule (6-x,y). So,

$(4,1)\rightarrow (2,1);$
$(3,2)\rightarrow (3,2);$
$(4,3)\rightarrow (2,3);$
$(5,2)\rightarrow (1,2)$

These points are exactly the vertices of the initial square.

Consider option C.

1st transformation $(x+3,y+3)$ will map vertices of the square into points

$(2,1)\rightarrow (5,4);$
$(1,2)\rightarrow (4,5);$
$(2,3)\rightarrow (5,6);$
$(3,2)\rightarrow (6,5).$

2nd transformation = reflection over y = -x + 7 will map vertices into points

$(5,4)\rightarrow (3,2);$
$(4,5)\rightarrow (2,3);$
$(5,6)\rightarrow (1,2);$
$(6,5)\rightarrow (2,1)$

These points are exactly the vertices of the initial square.

Consider option D.

1st transformation $(x-3,y-3)$ will map vertices of the square into points

$(2,1)\rightarrow (-1,-2);$
$(1,2)\rightarrow (-2,-1);$
$(2,3)\rightarrow (-1,0);$
$(3,2)\rightarrow (0,-1).$

2nd transformation = reflection over y = -x + 2 will map vertices into points

$(-1,-2)\rightarrow (4,3);$
$(-2,-1)\rightarrow (3,4);$
$(-1,0)\rightarrow (2,3);$
$(0,-1)\rightarrow (3,2)$

These points are not the vertices of the initial square.

5 0

3 years ago