Answer: False
Explanation:
The price elasticity of supply measures the change in quantity supplied when the price changes.
The basic trend is that when price increases, quantity supplied increases as well. The reverse is true.
Price elasticity of supply = %Change in quantity supplied / % change in price
0.5 = -6% / Change in price
0.5 * Change in price = -6%
Change in price = -6% / 0.5
= -12%
The statement above is therefore false because price should have reduced by 12% for quantity supplied to reduce by 6%
Answer:
The amount to save now is = $862.03 (to 2 decimal places)
Explanation:
In order to solve this, we will compute the end-of-year amounts using the 5% increase each year. This is done as follows:
Year 1 ending = $200
Year 2:
Year 2 beginning price = $200
Note that 5% increase = 5/100 = 0.05
increase in year 2 = 5% of 200 = 0.05 × 200 = 10
Year 2 new price = 200 + 10 = $210
Year 3:
beginning price = $210
increase in year 3 = 0.05 × 210 = $10.5
Year 3 new price = 210 + 10.5 = $220.5
Year 4
beginning price = $220.5
interest in year 4 = 0.05 × 220.5 = 11.025
new price in year 4 = 220.5 + 11.025 = $231.525
Next to calculate the amount needed to pay for one travel ticket per year for the next four years, we will add the prices of the tickets each year as follows:
Total amounts needed = 200 +210 + 220.50 + 231.53 = $862.03
Answer:
The correct answer is: negative message framing.
Explanation:
Negative message framing refers to the type of advertisement in which it is exposed benefits of a product in a very aggressive manner, showing proof of what the beneficial results of that product are or what the consequences of not having that product could lead to. As part of the marketing strategy, the advertisement is repeatedly prompted during events related to the use of the product.
Answer:
Explanation:
If a company(Marriott in this case) uses a single hurdle rate to decide whether an investment should be undertaken or not, some projects that need to be accepted would end up being rejected and vice versa. For example,
if Marriott's hurdle rate is 10% and it's evaluating
project A with a 15% cost of capital &
project B with a 6% cost of capital .
Evaluation:
Project A would probably lead to a negative NPV because the cost of capital is higher (meaning it is riskier than the firm) hence could be rejected, but using the company hurdle rate of 10% to evaluate it could make its NPV positive. This would ignore the actual additional risk of the project.
Answer:
$500
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
Data provided in the question
Sale value of five year old car to used car = $3,000
Now in the same year, the resales value to Ima Goner = $3,500
So, the contribution made in the GDP for the year 2005 is
= Resales value to Ima Goner - Sale value of five year old car to used car
= $3,500 - $3,000
= $500
