Answer:
Materials handling Allocation= $27.5
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Each chair consists of 10 separate parts totaling $165 direct materials and requires 5.0 hours of machine time to produce.
Materials handling= $2.75 per part
Machining= $5.00 per machine hour
Assembling= $1.50 per part
Packaging= $3.75 per finished unit
Material Handling allocation base is: Number of parts.
Allocation= 10 parts* $2.75= $27.5
Answer:
nothin
Explanation:
They don't work hard enough
oh no
our table
it's broken!!!!!!
Answer:
(B) the macroeconomy
Explanation:
The condition of the macroeconomy would exert the most influence of a firm's decision to hire more workers. As economic growth increases and demand grows, the firm is likely to hire more workers to meet increasing demand for its goods. On the other hand, in an economic recession, the firm is likely to hire less and even lay off its existing workers as demand for its goods reduces.
Option A is incorrect as a firm would not hire more workers even at low wage levels if the economy is in a recession. Option C is incorrect as the level of a firm's income would likely not be considered in its hiring decision if demand for its goods was very high. Option D is incorrect as the household income would likely not be considered by the firm in its hiring decision.
As seen in the chart B has the comparative advantage in coal because 1/3 > 1/5 It means they are better at producing coal than the U.S.Have in mind examples like:
U.S.
1 barrel of oil = 4 hrs
1 ton of coal = 5 hrs
B
1 barrel of oil = 7 hrs
1 ton of coal = 3 hrs
After seeing this we can say that the country which has more availability has a comparative advantage over other countries.
Hope this helps
Answer:
Fisher effect
Explanation:
Fisher effect is the effect in the economic theory that is established by the economist Irving Fisher, which states the relationship among the inflation and both nominal and the real interest rates.
This effect state that the real rate of interest equals to the nominal rate of interest deduct the expected inflation rate.
So, the relationship which is mentioned in the question is the fisher effect as it state the rate of interest that reflect the expectations likely the future inflation rates.
