Answer: The ultimate goal of the peer review process is that you can have others review and look over your work for things that are incorrect, need fixing, or need rewording. When we write things on our own, we sometimes make unconscious errors that we sometimes do not even catch in revision. Having a new set of eyes look at something helps to catch errors that we might miss. It is very similar to reading your work out load to catch errors, as reading something out loud is another effective strategy when reviewing your work.
It would be fittest
hope this helps
I believe the answer is Planet Nine.
<span>No, it does not mean that the interpretation or design of the first experiment was wrong. What it could mean is that using unboiled water or the lack of paraffin was not the catalyst that caused the carbon dioxide to be produced.</span>
Answer: <u>Option C, they digest pathogens</u>
Explanation: Monocytes are involved in the process of digesting pathogens and infected cells, termed as phagocytosis.
Monocytes don't produce antibodies, only B cells can produce antibodies. So, option A and D are incorrect. Also they appear colorless when observed under the microscope. They don't appear granular, so option B is also incorrect.
