Help !!!!! GEOMETRY PEOPLE HELP ME LOVES

Mathematics

2 answers:

chubhunter [2.5K]2 years ago

4 0

The new triangle produced is exactly identical to the parent triangle - no change in size, shape, rotation, or vertex position. This transformation is, therefore, an isometry.

Brrunno [24]2 years ago

3 0

The new triangle produced is an exact remake of the first one. The angles or size does not change between the two. Thus, this transformation is an Isometry.

You might be interested in

Consider the line integral Z C (sin x dx + cos y dy), where C consists of the top part of the circle x 2 + y 2 = 1 from (1, 0) t

pashok25 [27]

Direct computation:

Parameterize the top part of the circle $x^2+y^2=1$ by

$\vec r(t)=(x(t),y(t))=(\cos t,\sin t)$

with $0\le t\le\pi$ , and the line segment by

$\vec s(t)=(1-t)(-1,0)+t(2,-\pi)=(3t-1,-\pi t)$

with $0\le t\le1$ . Then

$\displaystyle\int_C(\sin x\,\mathrm dx+\cos y\,\mathrm dy)$

$=\displaystyle\int_0^\pi(-\sin t\sin(\cos t)+\cos t\cos(\sin t)\,\mathrm dt+\int_0^1(3\sin(3t-1)-\pi\cos(-\pi t))\,\mathrm dt$

$=0+(\cos1-\cos2)=\boxed{\cos1-\cos2}$

Using the fundamental theorem of calculus:

The integral can be written as

$\displaystyle\int_C(\sin x\,\mathrm dx+\cos y\,\mathrm dy)=\int_C\underbrace{(\sin x,\cos y)}_{\vec F}\cdot\underbrace{(\mathrm dx,\mathrm dy)}_{\vec r}$

If there happens to be a scalar function $f$ such that $\vec F=\nabla f$ , then $\vec F$ is conservative and the integral is path-independent, so we only need to worry about the value of $f$ at the path's endpoints.