Answer:1.Leadership has been defined asD) the ability to influence a group toward the achievement of a vision or set of goals
2.Nonsanctioned leadership is as important as formal influence.
3.E) the match between the leader's style and the degree to which the situation gives the leader control
4.E) emotional stability
5.B) empathy
6.B) differences between an effective and an ineffective leader
Explanation: a leadership goal is to lead a group towards achieving a set vision of whatever project they may be working on hence it is important that a leader is able to handle their own emotions , be emotional stable because they are dealing with different types of people. They don't have to harsh they still have to show empathy towards what the team may be going through due to the amount of work they are doing. All of these theories gives us what set apart an effective to a non effective leader which makes a leader choose which path they want to take.
Answer:
d. an approach to gaining knowledge about behavior and mental processes by observation and measurement only
Explanation:
In philosophy, empiricism is a school of psychology that focuses in the way we gain knowledge and it establishes that <u>we can only gain real knowledge by the information we get from our senses and experiences</u>, in other words, empiricism gives importance to the <u>empirical evidence</u> that we gain from our experiences and therefore to the observations and measures we can do (instead of relying on reasoning and what our mind tells us)
Therefore, empiricism is an approach to gaining knowledge about behavior and mental processes by observation and measurement only.
Answer: T
Explanation: Its very research-driven.
Answer:
National heritage defines the critical moments in our development as a nation and reflects achievements, joys and sorrows in the lives of Australians. It also encompasses those places that reveal the richness of Australia's extraordinarily diverse natural heritage.
<h3><u>
Full question:</u></h3>
Why is persistent unemployment a possibility in the Keynesian model but NOT in the classical model?
A) The Keynesian model assumes that the level of real GDP is inflexible.
B) The Keynesian model assumes that people work for motives other than those of earning an income for themselves and supporting a family.
C) The Keynesian model assumes that workers can lose their jobs to foreign competition during economic downturns.
D) The Keynesian model assumes that nominal wages are inflexible downward.
<h3><u>
Answer:</u></h3>
The Keynesian model assumes that nominal wages are inflexible downward - is persistent unemployment a possibility in the Keynesian model
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
The classical model is quite the usual microeconomic principles. Keynes claimed that the classical model is not common. In the classical model, the basis for the rationalizing is notional demand and supply, which implies market equilibrium. Keynes proposed the idea of aggregate demand, the overall demand for products and services in the economy.
Keynes supposed that the unemployment force persists regularly. Keynes was suspicious that the economic dominance of demand and supply drive the economy to a common equilibrium. Rising government spending or cutting taxes will boost aggregate demand.
<u />
