Answer:
Please see explanation for the answer. The code is written in python and is as given below:
Step-by-step explanation:
The solution is obtained on the Python with the following code
import matplotlib.pyplot as plotter
import numpy as npy
x_s = npy.linspace(-5,5,100) #Defining a linear sample space with boundaries as -5 to 5 and 100 as number of samples.
def sigmo(z):return 1/(1 + npy.exp(-z)) #Defining sigmoid function for the f(x).
plotter.plot(x_s, sigmo(x_s))
plotter.plot([-5,5],[.5,.5])
plotter.xlabel("z")
plotter.ylabel("sigmoid(z)")
plotter.show()
Answer:
Animal books make up (3/20) of all books
Step-by-step explanation:
Let X be the total number of books, made up of nonfiction, animal, and all others.
(3/5)X are nonfiction books.
Of the nonfiction books, 1/4 are animal books: (3/5)*(1/4)X = (3/20)X are animal books
[This means that Nonfiction, less animal books is: (3/5)X - (3/20)X]
Animal books make up (3/20) of all books.
12 minutes because 80-20 is 60 and 60 divides by 5 is 12
Answer:
The answer to your question is: I bought 7 snacks
Step-by-step explanation:
Data
beginning balance = $42 = b
lunch = $1.80 = l
snack = $ 0.85 = s
final balance = $0.05 = f
f = b - 1.8l - 0.05s
0.05 = 42 - 1.8l - 0.85s
After 20 days I spent = 1.8(20) in lunches = $36
0.05 = 42 - 36 - 0.85s
0.05 = 6 - 0.85s
0.05 - 6 = -0.85s
-5.95 = -0.85s
s = -5.95/-0.85
s = 7
Answer:
No, her answer is unreasonable because 0.2 * 6 = 1.2
Step-by-step explanation:
Here in this question, we are trying to use an approximation to see if what was said to be the result of a calculation is reasonable as an answer.
Looking at her division, 2.76/6 = 0.19
To the nearest tenth , 0.19 is same as 0.2, now multiplying 0.2 by 6, what we have is 1.2 ( of which even 0.19 * 6 is expected to be less than this). we can see that this value is quite far from our expected answer of 2.76 which makes the answer an unreasonable one
Thus, the division 2.76/6 = 0.19 is not a reasonable answer
