1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Travka [436]
3 years ago
11

621000 in scientific notation

Mathematics
2 answers:
Alborosie3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

the correct answer is 6.21×10^5

Murljashka [212]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

6.21 x 10^5

Step-by-step explanation:

Move the decimal so there is one non-zero digit to the left of the decimal point. The number of decimal places you move will be the exponent on the  

10

. If the decimal is being moved to the right, the exponent will be negative. If the decimal is being moved to the left, the exponent will be positive.

You might be interested in
Describe any trends that you can see from the dot plot.<br> Help
stealth61 [152]

Answer: Most planes flew below the optimal cruising speed. There is a cluster at the speeds 0.82 through 0.85. Also, the data is close to being symmetric

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
How do you recognize an exponential situation?
Hitman42 [59]
You can divide by the same number every time
3 0
3 years ago
The figure below shows the ideal pattern of movement of a herd of cattle, with the arrows showing the movement of the handler as
mafiozo [28]

Based on the theory, the distance from the starting point to the return point = Arc length = 109.9 feet.

<h3>What is the Length of an Arc?</h3>

Arc length = ∅/360 × 2πr

Since the sector formed is a quarter circle, then ∅ = 90°.

Raidus (r) = 70 ft

Distance from the starting point to the return point = arc length.

Arc length = ∅/360 × 2πr =  90/360 × 2π(70)

Arc length = 109.9 feet

Therefore, based on the theory, the distance from the starting point to the return point = Arc length = 109.9 feet.

Learn more about the arc length on:

brainly.com/question/2005046

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
SOMEBODY PLEASE HELP QUICK!!! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
Anna71 [15]

Carlos is correct

Since we don't know the length of sides PR and XZ, the triangles can't be congruent by the SSS theorem or the SAS theorem, and since we don't know the measure of angles Y and Q, the triangles can't be congruent by the ASA theorem, the SAS theorem or the AAS theorem. Therefore, Carlos is correct.

Carlos is correct. Since the angles P and X are not included between PQ and RQ and XY and YZ, the SAS postulate cannot be used, since it states that the angle must be included between the sides. Unlike with ASA, where there is the AAS theorem for non-included sides, there is not SSA theorem for non-included angles, so the triangles cannot be proven to be congruent.

3 0
3 years ago
Which reflection rule, if any, can be used to prove that rectangle A(-8, -3), B(-2, -3), C(-2, -6), D(-8, -6) and rectangle A'(8
JulijaS [17]
A, Y doesn’t change and X becomes negative
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A regular hexagon has an apothem measuring 14 cm and an approximate perimeter of 96 cm.
    12·2 answers
  • Is (1,2) the point of intersection of y=3x-1 and y=-x+3?​
    9·1 answer
  • Math help please =)
    11·1 answer
  • I NEEEEDD HELPPP!!!!!!!
    6·1 answer
  • Find the measures of angles 1-10
    9·1 answer
  • What is the difference between Compound Interest and simple interest???
    12·1 answer
  • Elimination_4x_2y=14<br> _10x+7y=_24
    15·1 answer
  • Kathy deposits $25 into an investment account with an
    7·1 answer
  • How many faces do a sphere and a cone have?
    7·2 answers
  • Is y – 4x = 9 a function?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!