Answer:
1) Part A)
Liters Mililiters
1 1,000
5 5,000
8 8,000
14 14,000
2) Part B)
One way to convert 4.2 liters to milliliters is to <u> multiply </u> the number of liters by the number of milliliters in 1 liter. This means there are <u> 4,200 </u>milliliters in 4.2 liters. The cafeteria has the greatest amount of <u> orange </u>juice, the second greatest amount of <u> grape </u> juice, and the least amount of <u> cranberry </u>juice.
Explanation:
<u>1) Data:</u>
- Grape juice: 8,000 mililiters
- Cranberry juice: 4.2 liter
- Orange juice: 12,000 mililiters
- There are 1,000 mililiers in 1 liter
<u>2) Part A:</u>
<u>Table:</u>
The table is garbled. This is what the tables could look like:
Liters Mililiters
1 1,000
5 5,000
8 8,000
14 14,000
You can see that the table shows a direct relationship between the number of mililiters and the number of liters:
- 1,000/1 = 1,000
- 5,000/5 = 1,000
- 8,000/8 = 1,000
- number of mililiters / liters = 1,000
<u>3) Part B)</u>
Fill in the blanks to explain how Landon can convert 4.2 liters of cranberry juice to mililiters so he can compare the amounts of the different juices:
i) One way to convert 4.2 liters to milliliters is to <u> multiply </u> the number of
liters by the number of milliliters in 1 liter.
- As demonstrated above there is a direct relationship between the number of mililiters and the number on liters, then you must multiply the number of liters by the proportionality constant to find the number of mililiters.
ii) This means there are <u> 4,200 </u>milliliters in 4.2 liters.
- That is the product 4.2 × 1,000 = 4,200.
iii) The cafeteria has the greatest amount of <u> orange </u>juice, the second greatest amount of <u> grape </u> juice, and the least amount of <u> cranberry </u>juice.
Rank the amounts:
↑ ↑ ↑
orange grape cranberry
Answer:
64 and 81
Step-by-step explanation:
Determine whether the relation is a function. {(−3,−6),(−2,−4),(−1,−2),(0,0),(1,2),(2,4),(3,6)}
Gennadij [26K]
Answer:
The relation is a function.
Step-by-step explanation:
In order for the relation to be a function, every input must only have one output. Basically, you can't have 2 outputs for 1 input but you can have 2 inputs for 1 output. Looking at all of the points in the relation, we see that no input has multiple outputs, so the answer is yes, the relation is a function.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::deleted::::::::::::::::::::::::::::