Well first we need to change the format of the equations to slope-intercept, or y=mx+b.
So the first one (x + y < 1) will be changed to y < -x + 1.
The second one (2y ≥ x - 4) will be changed to y <span>≥ x/2 - 2.
Now we can analyze each graph.
In every single graph the first equation (y < -x + 1) is graphed correctly.
Now for the second equation, we can see that only the first and last graph correctly format to the equation.
Now for the shading:
The first equation shows us that y is less than -x +1, making the shading go under the dotted line. (to the left)
The second equation shows us that y is greater than or equal to x/2 - 2, making the shading go above the line. (also to the left)
Therefore, when we shade, the overlapping shading is correctly formatted in the first graph.
Hope this helped, comment any questions you have for me.</span>
Answer:
The correct option is D.) Causation cannot be determined from an observational study.
Step-by-step explanation:
The conclusion is not correct because
D.) Causation cannot be determined from an observational study.
Causation determined from an observational study is speculative and cannot be confirmed without data from a real experiment.
Answer:
124 tiles
Step-by-step explanation:
2(20+40)
2(60)
120+4=124
Answer: y = −
2
x + 8
Step-by-step explanation:
Use the slope formula and slope-intercept form y
=
m
x
+
b to find the equation.
y = −
2
x + 8
I hope this help.
All have a acute angle each have three sides i hope that's what your asking
