Answer:
Below:
Explanation:
For Muslims, the Qur'an is the word of God. Both Sunni and Shi'ah traditions regard it as the one and only source of authority, though they may look to other works or teachers for guidance on its interpretation. ... The Hadith are the Prophet Muhammad's teachings about how to live life according to the Qur'an.
The Qur'an is the authority a muslim needs in life to some christians is right because it was made by Allah which teaches the ways of Islam and how to act upon them which makes them believe the Qur'an is the most only authority a muslim needs in life. ... However other muslims think because of free will they can choose.
Hope it helps...
It’s Muska....≧◉◡◉≦
1: b)A businessman that stole millions of dollars from his clients
2: c)felony
3: c)Arresting a suspect without reading their Miranda rights
4: c)An employee steals products from their employer.
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
In the context of classical conditioning, closing the door has become a(n) conditioned stimulus.
Explanation:
A conditioned stimulus, in classical conditioning, can be defined as a previously neutral stimulus that has become associated with an unconditioned stimulus, beginning to trigger a response.
It is very likely that closing a door didn't mean much to students in general (neutral). However, it was paired with the announcement of a quiz. Announcing a quiz (unconditioned) triggers a response - students feel surprised, anxious, worried, etc. After pairing up both stimuli a few times, students learn to associate them. Now, closing the door is a conditioned stimulus. Even if the professor does not announce a quiz, students will feel anxious and worried just by watching him close the door.
Answer:
Explanation:
El Foro y la Mesa Redonda son muy similar pero tienen tambien una grande diferencia. El foro tambien donde se reunen para discutir diferentes asuntos y donde todos escuchando pueden intevenir en la discusion, incluyendo el auditorio. La Mesa redonda es mas para una cierta cantidad de sujetos que se reunen para desarollar un tema en especifico. En otras palabras la gran diferencia entre las dos son la cantidad de individuos que participan en la discussion.
Answer:
(B) Led to the "one-person, one-vote" judicial doctrine - Prohibited oddly-shaped majority-minority districts
Explanation:
Baker v. Carr (1961) is a Supreme Court case concerning equality in voting districts. Decided in 1962, the ruling established the standard of "one person, one vote" and opened the door for the Court to rule on districting cases.
Shaw v. Reno (1993) In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two “majority-minority” districts. The group claimed that the districts were racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race cannot be the predominant factor in creating districts.
