Answer:
Both b. and c.
That is
b. i’m sorry, but the transfer disclosure statement covers all material facts that must be disclosed, and a person having aids is not a material fact, whether or not it would be applicable in this situation.
c. i’m sorry, but i am not permitted to answer this question, as it could be a potential civil rights violation, under the federal and state fair housing laws.
Explanation:
In the given instance the buyer if the property is asking if the previous tenant had AIDS and wants to use this information in the purchasing process. This is illegal and could result in legal action due to civil rights violation. Discrimination is not allowed in deciding to do business with another party, and the buyer is trying to discriminate on the grounds that the previous owner had AIDS.
Also in disclosing relevant information, wether the previous owner had AIDS is irrelevant to the sale of the house as it does not affect the quality of the house.
Answer:
the dialectic method
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the process that is being used is known as the dialectic method. This is a form of research in which competing ideas, perspectives, or arguments are analyzed in order to understand the potential truths, advantages, and disadvantages of the aspects being discussed.
Patronizing a store means helping it buy going there often, and basically buying things often and consequently giving it money..
Patronizing a little brother means behaving condescendingly towards, a kind of master-slave relationship... One should never do that...
Answer:
35.92%
Explanation:
The computation of cost of not taking the cash discount is shown below:-
Discount percentage ÷ (100 - Discount percentage) × (360 ÷ (Full Allowed Payment Days - Discount Days))
= 3% ÷ 97% × 360 ÷ (50 - 19)
= 3% ÷ 97% × 360 ÷ 31
= 0.03093 × 11.61290
= 0.359187
= 35.92%
Therefore for computing Mr. Warner's cost of not taking the cash discount we applied the above formula.
Answer: Sell before assembly, the company will be better off by $1 per unit.
Explanation:
To solve the above question, we need to calculate the incremental profit or loss first. This will be:
= After assembling sales value - Unassembled unit sales value - Coat if further processing
= $87 - $62 - $26
= -$1
Since there is an incremental loss of $1, then the correct answer is "Sell before assembly, the company will be better off by $1 per unit".
