Answer:
Option (a) is correct.
Explanation:
France can produce four phones or three computers:
Opportunity cost of producing one phone = (3 ÷ 4)
= 0.75 computers
Opportunity cost of producing one computer = (4 ÷ 3)
= 1.33 phones
Sweden can produce one phone or two computers:
Opportunity cost of producing one phone = (2 ÷ 1)
= 2 computers
Opportunity cost of producing one computer = (1 ÷ 2)
= 0.5 phones
Therefore,
France has a comparative advantage in producing phones because of the lower opportunity cost of producing it than Sweden. France should specialize in producing phones and import computers from Sweden.
Sweden has a comparative advantage in producing computers because of the lower opportunity cost of producing it than France. Sweden should specialize in producing computers and import phones from France.
Answer:
Imports create greater competition in the domestic marketplace.
Explanation:
Comparative advantage is defined as the ability of a company to produce goods at a lower opportunity cost than other competitors. They can now sell the goods at lower prices.
If the company in this scenario have competitive advantage in producing electronics then it is xheap for them to produce.
When they export electronics and import again, it can only mean that the imported electronics have a competitive edge that the company wants to take advantage of. For example higher quality than what is available locally.
Lots of ways pick a subject and try hard.
Answer:
It is focusing on looking over financial system risks and engages at home or abroad to help insure that the system stays healthy for the ecomomey, basically for households in the U.S., communities, as well as businesses in the U.S..
Answer:
procedural unconscionability
Explanation:
Since Nate is finding the language of the contract difficult to understand. This is most likely a case of procedural unconscionability.
In contract law, procedural unconscionability refers to a situation where the unconscionability results from <u>inequalities between the parties in respect of age, intelligence,</u> and relative bargaining power.
Furthermore, procedural unconscionability projects an indication that both parties did not freely consent to all terms proposed.
