We produce formaldehyde for medicinal purposes and synthesizing polyester.
Formaldehyde is a compound that is required in about 1.5 ounces in quantity as a normal part of our metabolism.
Also formaldehyde is used as a catalyst in the formation for the synthesis of many polyesters.
Formaldehyde also has many uses such as fungicide, germicide, disinfectant and as a preservative in mortuaries as well as important chemical in medical Laboratories.
In everyday items press fabric paints coating and paper base products also includes formaldehyde.
To know more about formaldehyde, visit,
brainly.com/question/29550668
#SPJ4
Mg (s) ---> Mg²⁺ (aq) + 2e
Co²⁺ (aq) + 2e ---> Co(s)
Cu (s) ---> Cu²⁺ (aq) + 2e
Au²⁺ (aq) + 2e ---> Au(s)
3. Other names for S- waves are secondary waves, shear waves, and sometimes elastic S-waves. Other names for P-waves are primary waves and compressional waves.
4. You need 3 stations, because scientists find the difference between the arrival times of the primary and the secondary waves at each of the 3 stations, then the time difference is used to determine the distance of the epicentre from each station. The greater the difference in time, the further away the epicentre is. A circle is drawn around each station, with a radius corresponding to the epicentre’s distance from that station. The point where the three circles meet is the epicentre. If you only had two stations, you could only predict the epicentre, as the point where all three circles meet wouldn’t be complete, you’d have to try and estimate where the third one would intercept. This would greaten the chance of error and isn’t as accurate.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Forged parts are often tougher than cast parts. This can be determined by performing tensile tests on various areas on the parts. Additionally, the microstructures of forged and cast parts can be used to determine if a part was forged or cast. The microstructure of a cast part will have a more uniform grain structure.
Explanation:
It seems more and more there are fewer conservation organizations who speak for the forest, and more that speak for the timber industry. Witness several recent commentaries in Oregon papers that are by no means unique. I’ve seen similar themes from other conservation groups across the West in recent years.
Many conservation groups have uncritically adopted views that support more logging of our public lands based upon increasingly disputed ideas about forest health and fire ecology, as well as the age-old bias against natural processes like wildfire and beetles.
For instance, an article in the Portland Oregonian quotes Oregon Wild’s executive director Sean Stevens bemoaning the closure of a timber mill in John Day Oregon. Stevens said: “Loss of the 29-year-old Malheur Lumber Co. mill would be ‘a sad turn of events’” Surprisingly, Oregon Wild is readily supporting federal subsidies to promote more logging on the Malheur National Forest to sustain the mill.
