The infliction of mental suffering is usually easier to detect than other forms of abuse. This statement is True
<h3>
What is Mental suffering?</h3>
- Mental suffering, sometimes known as "mental anguish," is the discomfort, dysfunction, or misery of the mind; it typically follows bodily pain or injury.
- It also refers to emotional distress brought on by another person's actions, including extremely unpleasant feelings like worry, despair, sorrow, grief, horror, shame, or rage.
- It is significant to remember that discomfort, whether mental or emotional, is typically brought on by an outside source and, when severe enough, may serve as a foundation for suing for damages in a tort case.
- As long as it is reasonable to assume that mental trauma would naturally result from the incident, physical injuries is typically not required in order to obtain damages for mental suffering.
- The objective test for determining whether such an assumption is acceptable calls for a cap on compensation for non-economic damages of between $250,000 and $500,000 for all non-economic damages.
To know more about mental suffering with the given link brainly.com/question/10449105
#SPJ4
Answer:
Employment, property and family law.
Explanation:
The ERA has to be considered in its historical context. It was first proposed in 1923, at a time where women had little or no rights regarding work and payment and faced discrimination. The ERA proposed a total abolition of law discrimination based on sex, which would have been revolutionary at the time. Later, during the 1960s and 1970s when the ERA was again discussed, some of the problems were solved with other laws, like the Equal Pay Act or the Civil Rights Acts. However, while these acts are a key part of American Legislation, the ERA is a Constitutional Amendment, which would give a completely new level of protection.
There is criticism, mainly because many of the laws and guarantees gained during the past 100 years have been tailored to protect women in their specificity. And many fear that the ERA would negatively override those protections. However, as an Amendment, any discrimination based on sex could be challenged based on unconstitutionality. And as of now, women still suffer discrimination and the acts and laws enacted so far are not sufficient.
Tariff makes the most sense. Embargo is a ban on goods or a country, subsidy is money granted from the government to a business and has nothing to do with trade, quota is a limited amount of a product and again doesn't really have anything to do with trade.
Answer:
A: the national government had no constitutional right to pass a tax to support manufacturing
Explanation:
got it right. hope this helps.!!
The caste system regulated many aspects of live, such as what jobs one would have, whom one could marry and the position in the society.
These were taken to be almost impossible to change and they made the society less flexible, with less changes. People didn't see much change nor did they expect many changes, and this stability gave a sense of order.
