All categories

3 years ago

Three strategies to use when negotiating a solution are to do the unexpected, to provide a way out, and to _____.

Business

2 answers:

liraira [26]3 years ago

7 0

be willing to apologize

Alex Ar [27]3 years ago

4 0

The last strategy is to have the willingness to apologize. It is because in order to negotiate a solution or solve them, it is best that a person should know and have the willingness to apologize, whether they are the reason why it happened or not because this is one of the strategy that will fix the situation for it is a sign of showing respect and to show that a person who has that attitude has the willingness to solve the solution and dismiss the argument.

You might be interested in

A struggling company currently has a total value of $700,000. It owes $500,000 from debt financing (assume these are loans from

Lynna [10]

Answer:

What is the current value of the firm to the owners?

total value - debt = $700,000 - $500,000 = $200,000

Show that this in expectation decreases the firm’s value, and explain why, in spite of that, the owners of the company would want to undertake the project.

the expected value of the company after the new project = (50% x 0) + (50% x $1,200,000) = $600,000, so the net value of the company actually decreases by $100,000.

the issue here is that if things go wrong, the owners will lose $200,000, but if things go well, then the owners equity will increase by $500,000 to a total of $700,000. In this case, the expected value of this project for the owners = (50% x -$200,000) + (50% x $700,000) = $250,000.

I am assuming that this company is some type of corporation, LLC or LLP, not a partnership or sole proprietorship. Under current bankruptcy laws, when a cooperation goes bankrupt, the owners are not personally liable for it.

8 0

3 years ago

If the goal is to cut the total amount of smoke in half in the neighborhood, what isthe cost-effective way to do this?

Darya [45]

Answer:

He should ask nieghbors to stop

Explanation:

Because asking nice is not a bad reason

4 0

3 years ago

Which would most likely shift the aggregate supply curve? a change in the prices of select one:

Delicious77 [7]

The product that would most likely shift the aggregate supply curve is the domestic products. The answer is letter A. The aggregate supply curve shows a relationship that is inverse between the price level and the quantity of real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) purchased. This is because it will increase the future demand.

4 0

3 years ago

Bigham Corporation, an accrual basis calendar year taxpayer, sells its services under 12-month and 24-month contracts. The corpo

Gnesinka [82]

Answer: 2016= $13,000; 2017= $25,000

Explanation:

for 2016

Income to be recognised in 2016 for 12 months term= Total proceeds x period of service provided (july -december )/ Total contract term

Income to be recognised in 2016= 14,000 x 6months /12months

= 14,000 x 1/2= $7,000

Income to be recognised in 2016 for 24 months term= Total proceeds x period of service provided (july -december )/ Total contract term

Income to be recognised in 2016= 24,000 x 6months /24months

= 24,000 x 1/4= $6,000

income to be recognized in taxable income in 2016= $7,000 + $6,000= $13,000

for 2017

Income to be recognised in 2017 for 12 months contract term= Total proceeds x remaining period of service provided from jan. to june 2017 / Total contract term

Income to be recognised in 2017= 14,000 x 6months /12months

= 14,000 x 1/2= $7,000

Income to be recognised in 2017 for 24 months contract term= Total proceeds x remaining period of service provided fromjuly 2016 -dec 2017/ Total contract term

Income to be recognised in 2016= 24,000 x (24-6) 18months /24months

= 24,000 x 3/4= $18,000

income to be recognized in taxable income in 2017= $7,000 + $18,000= $25,000

7 0

3 years ago

Zorn Co. budgeted $600,000 of factory overhead cost for the coming year. Its plantwide allocation base, machine hours, is budget

Amanda [17]

Answer:

False.

Explanation:

Given: Total budgeted factory overhead cost = $600000.

Plantwide allocation base= 100000 hours.

Now, finding plantwide factory overhead rate.

Formula; Plantwide factory overhead rate= $\frac{total\ budgeted\ factory\ overhead\ costs }{plantwide\ allocation\ base.}$

⇒ Plantwide factory overhead rate= $\frac{600000}{100000} = \$ 6 per\ hours$

Hence, Zorn´s plantwide factory overhead rate is $6 per hour not $3 per hour.

8 0

3 years ago