The way Holmes handles the perpetrators of the crimes affect how I view Holmes in a significant way: these examples show that, even with all the characteristics that put Holmes one step ahead of most human being, he is somehow still human, human enough to do something that is not considered right for many, but for him it is. It showed me that Holmes has an integrity I never considered before.
----
For me, it is, as it proves his integrity and also the dedication to his work. He does not want to punish the guilty, instead what really concerns Holmes is the discovery of the truth. In that sense, his mission is admirable.
----
Yes, it is possible to say that he sees himself as “above the law”. Holmes does not care for trivial human conventions, as he displayed on many occasions throughout his career. He believes that his ability and talent are enough to put him above the law.
----
It depends on what it is considered ethical. From his point of view, surely it is ethical. From the point of view of the justice system, it is surely not ethical. From a personal perspective, while I do understand his point of view, I do not consider his behavior ethical.
----
<span>I do consider his behavior ethical because, while he has many talents and abilities, no man should be seen himself as above the law. It takes only one man to consider himself as so to justify every other man to do the same, and so this would led to many men thinking they could do justice on their own. </span>
The Incas had a technologically advanced frame of mind while the Aztecs believed in sacrifice of humans. Both the Incas and Aztecs believed in and worshipped the sun god.
I think the most logical answer from my research is option c.
I'm not sure, but I tried.
Check out this website: http://www.notablebiographies.com/Ch-Co/Chaplin-Charlie.html .
It's really detailed and might help you find answers to your question.
Answer:
She has a very determined attitude.
Explanation:
"The Necklace," tells the story of a woman who borrowed a necklace from a friend and ended up breaking it. This woman is Madame Loisel and she borrowed the necklace to go to a fancy dinner at the company her husband works for. She had no jewelry and was embarrassed to look poor at dinner.
Madame Loisel believed that the necklace she broke was too expensive and she didn't have the courage to return the broken necklace to her friend, so she decided to work hard, in whatever job she could find, to be able to buy another necklace. She took a determined attitude and struggled to get the necessary money.
