Answer: • management innovation is essential to future organizational success
• we must look at management as a process, and then make improvements and innovation ongoing and systematic
• much of management theory is dated and doesn't fit the current realities of organizational life
Explanation:
The true statements regarding Gary Hamel's thoughts on management are:
1. management innovation is essential to future organizational success
2. we must look at management as a process, and then make improvements and innovation ongoing and systematic
3. much of management theory is dated and doesn't fit the current realities of organizational life
According to Gary Hamel, yesterday's best practices of organizations can not be creative or adaptable for the business challenges tomorrow.
That's a statement.
If its T/F, That is true <span />
The cost versus benefit test will not act as a good factor to measure tangible achievement.
Explanation:
Most of the Non-profit organization has a focus on welfare activities. The benefits can be influenced only by the subjective fulfillment of benefits. Executive members of all trusts are not able to calculate the benefits attained through welfare operations. Such a parameter system of identifying the beneficiaries' prospects of end-users is known as Intangible achievement.
The tangible achievement always lies in the status of invisible movements of each welfare operations. But each step of inducing the effects of cost versus benefit test does not suit to provide the effective to identify the tangible achievements.
There are 6 requirements for a verbal contract:
An offer. -- they had this
An acceptance. -- the contract was accepted
Competent parties who have the legal capacity to contract. - they both have the right to make this decision
Lawful subject matter. this is not an illegal operation
Mutuality of obligation. Both parties are obligated to do something in this case.
Consideration. if there were discussions of payment, then yes this is a legally enforceable contract.
Answer:
c. Work in Process--Department 2 375,000 Work in Process--Department 1 375,000
Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below:
Work in Process - Department 2 $375,000 ($100,000 + $125,000 + $150,000)
To Work in Proces - Department 1 $375,000
(Being the flow of cost from Dept 1 to Dept 2 is recorded)
Here the work in process for dept 2 is debited as it increased the assets and credited the work in process for dept 2 as it decreased the assets
