1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
max2010maxim [7]
4 years ago
12

The owner of a small firm has just purchased a personal computer, which she expects will serve her for the next two years. The o

wner has been told that she "must" buy a surge suppressor to provide protection for her new hardware against possible surges or variations in the electrical current, which have the capacity to damage the computer. The amount of damage to the computer depends on the strength of the surge. It has been estimated that there is a 1% chance of incurring 550 dollar damage, 6% chance of incurring 150 dollar damage, and 15% chance of incurring 100 dollar damage from a surge within the next two years. An inexpensive suppressor, which would provide protection for only one surge, can be purchased. How much should the owner be willing to pay if she makes decisions on the basis of expected value?
Mathematics
2 answers:
timurjin [86]4 years ago
5 0

Answer: The owner should not spend more than $29.95 for the surge.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hi, to answer this question we have to multiply each probability by the cost incurred, and then add the results.

1% chance of incurring 550 dollar damage = (1/100) 550 = $5.5

6% chance of incurring 150 dollar damage = (6/100) 150 =$ 9

15% chance of incurring 100 dollar damage = (15/100) 100 = $15

Expected value of repairs: $5.5 +$9+$15 =$29.5

The owner should not spend more than $29.95 for the surge.

tatiyna4 years ago
4 0

Answer: 26 dollars

Step-by-step explanation:

The owner needs to consider that:

To measure the risk she can multiply the probability of an event to happen  (P)* the impact (I) (in this case the impact is the cost).

All these eventes can be considered as independent between each other (no correlation), so you can add their  P*I.

In this case:

P1*I1= 1%*550=5.5

P2*I2=6%*150=9

P3*I3=15%*100=15

So, the expected value of what she may spend for repairng is = P1*I1+P2*I2+P3*I3= 5.5+9+15= 29.5

She shoould not spend more than 29.5 dollars, otherwise,  she will spend more in the surge supresor than in expected reapring value

You might be interested in
I need help with the following question, whichever one is right will get brainliest!
Schach [20]

Given: m∠A + m∠B = 90° (Definition of Complementary Angles).

Given: m∠B = (5x + 8)°

A) m∠A = 180° + (5x + 8) is your answer choice:

Why it isn't the others:

B) m∠A = 90° - (5x + 8)

You are solving for complementary angles (90° in total when combined), so you subtract the measurement for B (5x + 8) to get A.

C) m∠A = 180° - 2(5x + 8)°

You double the complementary angle to solve for the supplementary. Essentially, just divide this answer by two to get the complementary angles.

D) m∠A = 82 - 5x

I was confused by this one, but essentially they just did one step of the isolating the variable, which was subtracting 8 from both sides. They did not finish isolating the variable however.

8 0
3 years ago
State the missing reason in this flow proof
natali 33 [55]

The complete flow proof is:

  1. <em />\angle 5 = 40^o<em> ---- Given</em>
  2. <em> </em>\angle 2 = 140^o<em> ---- Given</em>
  3. <em />\angle 5 + \angle 2 = 180^o<em> ----- </em>\angle 5<em> and </em>\angle 2<em> are supplementary angles</em>
  4. <em />\angle 5 + \angle 2 = 180^o<em> ----- </em>\angle 5<em> and </em>\angle 2<em> are same-side interior angles</em>
  5. <em />a ||b<em> ----- Proved</em>

We have:

\angle 5 = 40^o

\angle 2 = 140^o

<u>The proof of </u>a ||b<u> is as follows:</u>

The first statement is:

\angle 5 = 40^o ---- Given

The next statement is:

\angle 2 = 140^o ---- Given

Supplementary angles add up to 180^o.

So, the third statement is:

\angle 5 + \angle 2 = 180^o ----- \angle 5 and \angle 2 are supplementary angles

Same side of interior angles add up to 180^o.

So, the fourth statement is:

\angle 5 + \angle 2 = 180^o ----- \angle 5 and \angle 2 are same-side interior angles

Because the angles are supplementary angles and also same-side interior angles, then it means that <em>line a is parallel to line b</em>

So, the last statement is:

a ||b ----- Proved

Read more about proofs of parallel lines at:

brainly.com/question/18396272

7 0
3 years ago
1/6 divided by 2/7 as a fraction
Vadim26 [7]

the answer is 7/12

1/6 / 2/7 = 7/12

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I need to know the start value!
alexandr1967 [171]

Answer: <em>1, i think :)</em>

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How many times does 7 go into 170
dedylja [7]

Answer: 2 times

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Staci is attending a music festival. The ticket to the festival costs $87.96 . Staci plans to purchase $30.00 t-shirts form the
    6·1 answer
  • a magazine has 5580000 subscribers this year. This number is down 7% from last year. How many subscribers were there last year?
    6·2 answers
  • Write 30/80 as a percent
    9·2 answers
  • The sweets bakery makes 156 dozen cookies per day. How many individual are baked each day
    10·1 answer
  • A dolphin ia at the surface of the water and then sescends to a depth of 4.5 feet. Then the dolphin swims down another 2.75 feet
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement best compares the graphs of y=-3x^n and y=3x^n?
    14·2 answers
  • Do someone mind helping me pls :)
    8·2 answers
  • Please help me someone!
    5·1 answer
  • Please help me this question..​
    14·2 answers
  • Find the number. 1.5 of 20
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!