In accordance with <em>propositional</em> logic, <em>quantifier</em> theory and definitions of <em>simple</em> and <em>composite</em> propositions, the negation of a implication has the following equivalence:
(Correct choice: iii)
<h3>How to find the equivalent form of a proposition</h3>
Herein we have a <em>composite</em> proposition, that is, the union of <em>monary</em> and <em>binary</em> operators and <em>simple</em> propositions. According to <em>propositional</em> logic and <em>quantifier</em> theory, the negation of an implication is equivalent to:
To learn more on propositions: brainly.com/question/14789062
#SPJ1
The answers For A,B,C.
A.2
B.2.25
C.1
Answer:
15 feet
Step-by-step explanation:
Quadrilateral ABCD has a scale facter of 2.5 over the quadrilateral EFGH. The order of ABCD is 60, 40, 30, and x, EFGH has y, z, 12, and 6.
6 times the scale factor of 2.5 is 15, the answer.
Answer: a=4
b=1600x
Step-by-step explanation:
Step-by-step explanation:
based on the story told I expected completely different questions.
but for the actually asked question the whole thing about gaining our not gaining weight is competent irrelevant. ignore it.
so, all we need to do is looking at the row totals.
27.4% of the participants took 1 vitamin.
49.5% of the participants took more than 1 vitamin.
so, 49.5% + 27.4% = 76.9% of all participants are taking vitamins in some form.
therefore, the second answer option is correct.
