1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
goblinko [34]
4 years ago
11

In the absence of market failures, when the government taxes market participants, the effect is to move the market: Group of ans

wer choices away from the competitive equilibrium, thereby enhancing social efficiency. closer to the competitive equilibrium, thereby enhancing social efficiency. closer to the competitive equilibrium, thereby reducing social efficiency. away from the competitive equilibrium, thereby reducing social efficiency.
Business
1 answer:
Minchanka [31]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Closer to the competitive equilibrium, thereby reducing social efficiency.

Explanation:

The market is not failed itself, so there is no need of taxes to clear it but to arrange revenue for government taxes some of the luxurious products  the tax shifts supply curve to left and decrease equilibrium quantity which makes the dead weight loss in the market and the quantity get away from the efficient level.

In absence of market failures, when the government taxes market participants, the effect is to move the market :

You might be interested in
Assume the bid rate of an Australian dollar is $0.60 while the ask rate is $0.61 at Bank Q. Assume the bid rate of an Australian
jarptica [38.1K]

Answer:

$16,393.44

Explanation:

Calculation for what would be your gain

Gain=$1,000,000/($0.61 per AUD)*$0.62 per AUD - $1,000,000

Gain=1,639,344*$0.62 per AUD - $1,000,000

Gain=$16,393.44

Therefore what would be your gain if you use $1,000,000 and execute locational arbitrage will be $16,393.44

3 0
3 years ago
Who want to teach me for be a hacker <br> im a good boy
mestny [16]

Ok ill teach ya then

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
your food-services company has been named as the sole provider of meals at a small university. the cost and demand schedules are
DiKsa [7]

Answer:

The answer is "400 meals at 2.50 dollars a day".

Explanation:

Please find the complete question and the solution in the attachment file.

In this question, when we compare the MR value as well as the MC, the monopolist produces up to the point where MR>MC.

In this, it happens before 400 meals at 2.50 per day and, so "400 meal at 2.50 dollars a day".

8 0
3 years ago
When comparing absorption costing and variable costing, if units produced are units sold, what is the effect on net operating in
11111nata11111 [884]

Answer:

The Net Operating income will be the same for both methods.

Explanation:

Net Operating income under absorption costing and variable costing methods usually differ because of existence of inventory.

Fixed overheads are deferred in Inventory when using absorption costing. Meaning that a higher income is obtained under absorption costing than variable costing when there is inventory and a lower income under absorption costing than variable costing.

When units produced are units sold, there is no inventory. Therefore, the Net Operating income will be the same for both methods.

8 0
3 years ago
Your firm is planning to invest in a new electrostatic power generation system. Electrostat Inc is a firm that specializes in th
kozerog [31]

Answer:

The cost of capital for electrostatic power generators is closest to 7.75%

Explanation:

In order to calculate the estimate of your cost of capital for electrostatic power generators we would have to make the following calculation:

Step-1, Calculation of the Overall Beta

Market Value of Equity = $40,00,00,000 [160,00,000 Shares x $25 per share]

Market Value of Debt = $22,00,00,000

Total Market Value = $62,00,00,000

Therefore, Beta = [Equity Beta x Weight of Equity] + [Debt Beta x Weight of Debt]

= [1.18 x ($40,00,00,000 / $62,00,00,000)] + [0.08 x ($22,00,00,000 / $62,00,00,000)]

= 0.761290 + 0.028387

= 0.789677

Step-2, Cost of capital

As per CAPM Approach, Cost of capital = Risk-free Rate x (Beta x Market Risk Premium)

= 3% + (0.789677 x 6%)

= 3% + 4.75%

= 7.75%

Therefore, the cost of capital for electrostatic power generators is closest to  7.75%

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Jared told his boss, Maggie, that he is going to start training for the upcoming marathon to be healthier and to have more energ
    14·1 answer
  • Sam, a citizen of Tennessee, files a suit in a Tennessee state court against United Sales Corporation, a Wyoming company that do
    15·2 answers
  • Accounts receivable amounts to $215,000 for the beginning of the year and
    5·1 answer
  • A codec converts an incoming digital signal to an analog signal for transmission over an analog network. True False
    11·1 answer
  • Space Fuel Inc. is considering establishing a new propellant depot to provide space vehicles a refueling point in their trek to
    5·1 answer
  • You purchased a stock at a price of $46.55. The stock paid a dividend of $1.79 per share and the stock price at the end of the y
    11·1 answer
  • At December 31, 2018, the financial statements of Hollingsworth Industries included the following: Net income for 2018 $ 590 mil
    13·1 answer
  • Quality Ceramic, Inc. (QCI) defined five submarkets within its broad product-market. To obtain some economies of scale, QCI deci
    11·1 answer
  • _______ involves developing and performing marketing activities across national boundaries.
    9·1 answer
  • which of the following is omitted in a barter transaction?a) tradeb) medium of exchangec) store of valued) money
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!