Australia is sparsely populated, pollution free zone in comparison with highly industrialized areas that's why Australia have presented itself as a superior alternative to living in industrialized England, Scotland, and Ireland
Explanation:
Australia is a country of southern hemisphere. It has completely different seasonal structure than the country of European continent. That is much favorable to live and Australia's population density is very low and it is sparsely populated where the distance between two consecutive houses are much.
Industrialization pollutes environment by emitting harmful gases in the environment and harmful pollutant through outlet of the industry. That's why Australia have presented itself as a superior alternative to living in industrialized European countries.
The correct answer is: "the private citizen who owns the factory".
It would be more accurate to say the private citizens who own the factory, as it is likely that the capital of the corporation is divided in shares, whose owners are in turn, also owners of the corporation in the proportion evidenced by the number of shares they hold.
The losses generated by the fire will be assumed by the capital available in the firm, and due to the increase suffered in the costs, owners will suffer a decrease in their dividends which are the return they receive for their invesment. In case that the available capital is not enough, investors can decide either to invest more money or to let the corporation go bankrupt. It is possible that the local community provides some aid in terms of funding in a mixed economy, to prevent job losses for example, but it is not mandatory that they do so.
In order to afford the large and immediate payments required in case of an unpredictable disaster or accident without risking the solvency of the whole business, firms sign insurance contracts and make periodic payments so that in case of an accident the insurance company would face all costs.
Answer:
b) athens was brought to its knees
Explanation:
John Locke believed that every person should have equal rights. He also believed that no one should be able to take them away.
This close alliance, which was based on mutual respect and good treatment from both sides, led the natives to side with the french in their conflicts with the english settlers that came later in the 1600s and into the mid 1700s. Relations between the natives and english were not nearly as good.
Hope this help you :)
