Answer:
Explanation:
A doctor’s fee for curing a severe wound would be 10 silver shekels for a gentleman, five shekels for a freedman and two shekels for a slave. Penalties for malpractice followed the same scheme: a doctor who killed a rich patient would have his hands cut off, while only financial restitution was required if the victim was a slave.
Well they were effected in many ways. some had to live without fathers and some even had there homes destroyed but most important of all is that they all had FREEDOM
Answer:
at can be found around the world:
Greywacke Statue Tribute to Isis.
Harrington Commode.
Goddard-Townsend Antique Secretary Desk.
Pinner Qing Dynasty Vase.
Rosetta Stone.
Diamond Panther Bracelet.
Napoleon's Gold-Encrusted Sword.
Explanation:
D) The passage of the amendments was to abolish slavery and establish rights to previous slaves.
Answer:
1. President Theodore Roosevelt’s big stick policy was used by the United States to negotiate an agreement for an American-led canal through Panama, spread American influence in Cuba, and broker a peace treaty between Russia and Japan. Big Stick diplomacy is the policy which refers to a carefully mediated negotiation "speak softly, and carry a big stick." and Roosevelt won the Nobel Peace Prize for it in 1906.
2.
<em>The results of the Big stick policy, Dollar diplomacy, and Moral diplomacy in Latin America made people in Latin America were angry at U.S. actions. </em>
<u>President Theodore Roosevelt named its foreign dominant policy, “Big stick policy”. He believed in this policy was the best to apply in Latin America and the Caribbean countries. On the other hand, President William Howard Taft created the Dollar diplomacy. It generated financial aid to support a Latin American region in order to maintain and control the trade and financial interest of the U.S. But people in Latin America did not like the U.S. intervention and many rebellions and uprisings were part of the reactions to these policies. So, The results of the Big stick policy, Dollar diplomacy, and Moral diplomacy in Latin America made people in Latin America were angry at U.S. actions. </u>
