Hey there!
Essentially in this quote, Boris Yelstin was stating that when the situation is critical, and in all times- people should have the freedom to think their own thoughts. Part of thinking your own thoughts is religion because your own thoughts are what you believe in- and that's your religion.
Therefore, your answer is B, freedom of belief- because he's talking about people should be able to have their own thoughts, and a thought can be a belief.
Hope this helps!
Answer:d.Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Explanation:
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal law which prevent discrimination against employees solely based on their sex,race,color, religion and national origin. It focuses mostly on federal,state and local governments. Title VII is also used in private and public universities and colleges.
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
On no account the officer leaves site of the body. In this situation the best possible person that can explain what happened, is the victim, the EMT has given a chance that the body is alive, a better opportunity for the officer to hear from the horse mouth, the officer should allow the transport of the body buy should not lose site of the body.
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
Answer:
social referencing
Explanation:
Aaron uses the emotional display in his mother's face to judge the situation and went to the mother to pick him since she was all smiling. Aaron is demonstrating social referencing. Infant start using this from when they are about 8 months old.
