1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
soldier1979 [14.2K]
4 years ago
5

10 g / 100 g times 100% = 10 %

Mathematics
1 answer:
spin [16.1K]4 years ago
7 0
The answer is H! :).
You might be interested in
STAR Co. provides paper to smaller companies whose volumes are not large enough to warrant dealing directly with the paper mill.
mamaluj [8]

Answer:

  see below

Step-by-step explanation:

In order for the problem to make sense, we have to assume typos in Patterns 2, 3, and 4. We suppose they should be (0, 0, 3, 10), (8, 0, 0, 4) and (2, 1, 2, 1).

If we let p, q, r, s, t represent the number of rolls cut to patterns 1 to 5, respectively, then we want ...

  minimize 10p +10q +4r +s +t . . . . . . . total trim loss

  subject to ...

     0p +0q +8r +2s +7t = 5672 . . . . . . number of 12-ft rolls

     6p +0q +0r +1s +1t = 1670 . . . . . . . . number of 15-ft rolls

     0p +3q +0r +2s +0t = 3200 . . . . . . number of 30-ft rolls

     p≥0, q≥0, r≥0, s≥0, t≥0

_____

The solution works out to be (p, q, r, s, t) = (1, 0, 253, 1600, 64) with a trim loss of 2686 feet (equivalent to 27 100-ft rolls).

Note that we have endeavored to fill the order exactly. We don't know if there are cut choices that would minimize loss further, but result in a few rolls extra of some width or another.

3 0
3 years ago
Write an equation to represent the following statement. j is 7 times as large as 6.
kramer

Answer:

Yes.

j=7*6

j=42

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Using logarithm table evaluate the<br>1.376<br>0.007​
kozerog [31]

Answer:

convert the expression for N into logs

evaluate those logs using a log table

thus determine log N

calculate antilog of log N

Thus,

log

N

=

(

647

⋅

32

×

0.00000147

8.473

×

64

)

=

log

(

647

⋅

32

)

+

log

(

0.00000147

)

−

log

(

8.473

)

−

log

(

64

)

6 0
3 years ago
Khalil says that any time two numbers are the same distance from 0, their sum will be zero. Marius disagrees. "Sometimes the sum
Gelneren [198K]

Answer:

Marius is right.

Step-by-step explanation:

So although what Khalil said could be correct, they didn't say it right. It would be any two numbers the same distance from 0 <u>going the opposite ways</u>, which means that if you had 3 on one side, you would have -3 on the other side. BUt since Khalil said it wrong, he's basically saying that you can do 3+3 because they're both the same distance away from 0. or you could do (-3)+(-3)=-6 which would still work because they're the same distance away from 0. So unless you just skipped on that part while typing the question, Marius is correct.

7 0
4 years ago
Problem
densk [106]

Answer:

what.....

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is a summary number model
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following expressions is equivalent to the expression x - (-3) ?
    14·1 answer
  • How do you do this question?
    5·1 answer
  • Please help me with #s 1 - 2- 3 and 6 I need it for today thank you
    12·1 answer
  • Six times the lesser of the two consecutive even integers is 4 times the greater even integer. What are the integers?
    14·1 answer
  • Classify the following triangle. Check all that apply.
    7·2 answers
  • Could yall help me pls?
    12·1 answer
  • On the graph, △DEF was transformed to create △DGH.
    9·2 answers
  • 12192 divided by 48 = ?
    12·1 answer
  • Pwease help again another brainliest for a very smart person UwU
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!