Answer and Explanation:
A peaceful way to change any government would require everyone in the country and the government to agree on a set of standards that everyone can live with and be protected by.
A change in the government would have to have reasons based on major factors, as little factors wont be enough to change.
<u><em>#teamtrees #PAW (Plant And Water)</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em>I hope this helps!</em></u>
The Governor General is the representative of the Sovereign in Canada.
The Governor General serves as the Head of State. He is responsible for the appointment of the Prime Minister. He gives the Royal Assent to the bills passed by the legislative in behalf of the Sovereign.
The Prime Minister serves as the Head of the Government. The Governor General, prime minister, and the cabinet form the Executive Branch of Government in Canada. The Prime Minister appoints Ministers of State to assist individual Cabinet Ministers in their executive duties.
<span>When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which implement them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal that, they are endowed by their creator with certain unAlienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, government are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new government, laying its foundation on such principals and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mandmknd are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. </span>
The assumptions are that if you cut taxes and costs for companies, then the company owners and investors will be able to bring about the growth of economy and employ more pepople. The benefits were that the economy entered a peacetiime and people were generally living better. The bad side was that public debt increased by a lot and this would come back to haunt the people later after Reagan was long gone.
Answer: Boycotting basically
shoutout to: @Greenleafable
remain heartless
