Answer:
Those against manifest destiny were abolitionists and those who did not want to see the spread of slavery.
Explanation:
<u>Answer:</u>
The decision from any journalist that violates the ethics of journalism is "A reporter writes a story about his wife’s company without revealing their relationship" and "A magazine runs a series of articles speculating about a celebrity’s medical history".
Option: (c) and (d)
<u>Explanation:</u>
- Society of Professional Journalists is the organization that represents the entire journalists of United States and it sets the boundary line for the journalist’s activities.
- For any journalist who attempts to write about the company of his wife without any mentioned relationship of theirs, it would violate the law.
- Similarly, it is beyond the ethics to write the series of reports about the medical history of celebrity.
Answer:
Role confusion
Explanation:
Role confusion is related to adolescence and teenage years. They get confused if they are unable to achieve something or face various kinds of scenarios.
In this question, Berney failed to find his niche and drifted into an aimless life of odd jobs and drug use.
In Erikson's terms, Bernie failed to solve the identity versus <u>Role confusion </u>crisis.
The man dispossess the other mans car for not paying it on time.
I think that the question is:
Which of the following would serve as support for this assertion? and apart from the first sentence, those are options.
and the answer is: both of the above. One sentence lists the benefits for the team and the other for the company.
