Flavius Josephus was born as Yosef ben Matityahu. He was a Jerusalem-born scholar who was captured by the Romans but was kept alive after convincing the emperor that he was a prophet.
He gave the soon-to-be emperor a prophecy that came true earning his trust and support. Yosef ben Matityahu changed his name to a Roman style (Titus Flavius Josephus) and firmly assimilated into Roman culture advocating on their behalf. He believed that Romans were merciful and “chosen by God”. Flavius asserted that “the Jewish were being punished” and tried to convince others as such by citing God saying God had chosen him to reveal these statements.
The correct answer should be
<span>The debate about whether the three estates would vote together or each vote separately
That is because the three layers of society, or the three estates, were treated as independent entities of each other, so when it came to voting, the debate was whether all three should vote independently of each other, or should it just be a free for all and everyone votes.</span>
<span />
<span>I think western movies could be more realistic by giving more details to the conflicts
Often time, movies always had the good guys and the bad guys.
To be more honest, every conflicts that happened throughout the histoy is simply happened because there were 2 sides that confront each other for different interests
as for who is 'bad' and who is 'good', it depended entirely to the side that the story teller is on</span>
Answer:
d. Giving too much influence to the wealthy.
Explanation:
Super PACs are a type of Political Action Committees, and PACs represent pools of campaing contributions and donates that money to the political candidates, in an United States elections. They channel funds for or against a candidate or a legislation.
Super PACs are officially known as independent-expenditure only committees, established in 2012. They engage in an unlimited political spending and are not tied to any political campaign. They can raise money from either individuals or corporations, and there are no legal limits on donation size. In that way, wealthy people can influence the outcome of the elections by spending unlimited amount of money for the support of their desired candidate.
