All categories

3 years ago

All other things being equal, what is the best type of investment income?

Business

1 answer:

Ivahew [28]3 years ago

8 0

Answer and Explanation:

The best type of investment income that is earned is tax-exempt that depend upon the commission only also the income that is spent should be bigger for the recipient

And at the time of seeking advice, the fee only should be likely to offer an unbiased advice because no other extra financial gains should be advised for an investment made except this professional fee

While the other options are ignored as they contain some interest regarding a commission for advising to their clients

You might be interested in

The Bureau of Transportation Statistics Omnibus Household Survey is conducted annually and serves as an information source for t

sasho [114]

Answer:

a) For this case we have quantitative data since we have frequencies per each category.

b) For this case is better use percentages since we have frequency counts per each

c) First we need to calculate the total for the frequencies:

$Total = 44+130+165+741= 1080$ respondents

For this case we can calculate the percentage like this:

$\% Strongly_{agree} = \frac{44}{1080} *100 =4.07\%$

d) For this case the percentage of people who agree with allowing drivers of motor vehicles to talk on a hand-held cell phone while driving is just 4.07% and by the other hand the rest of the people correspond to 95.93%.

$\frac{1036}{44}=23.55$

The people who are NOT strongly agree is about 24 times greater than the peopl who strongly agrees.

So we can say that we don't have a general support for the claim.

Explanation:

For this case we have the following data given:

Number of respondents that they strongly agree with the statement = 44

Number of respondents that they somewhat agree with the statement = 130

Number of respondents that they somewhat disagree agree with the statement = 165

Number of respondents that they strongly disagree agree with the statement = 741

Part a

Do the responses for this statement provide categorical or quantitative data?

For this case we have quantitative data since we have frequencies per each category.

Part b

Would it make more sense to use averages or percentages as a summary of the responses for this statement?

For this case is better use percentages since we have frequency counts per each category so then not makes sense calculate averages for this case.

Part c

What percentage of respondents strongly agree with allowing drivers of motor vehicles to talk on a hand-held cell phone while driving?

First we need to calculate the total for the frequencies:

$Total = 44+130+165+741= 1080$ respondents

For this case we can calculate the percentage like this:

$\% Strongly_{agree} = \frac{44}{1080} *100 =4.07\%$

Part d

For this case the percentage of people who agree with allowing drivers of motor vehicles to talk on a hand-held cell phone while driving is just 4.07% and by the other hand the rest of the people correspond to 95.93%.

$\frac{1036}{44}=23.55$

The people who are NOT strongly agree is about 24 times greater than the peopl who strongly agrees.

So we can say that we don't have a general support for the claim.

8 0

3 years ago

Women speakers who are nervous tend to wobble on their high heels.

Pachacha [2.7K]

Answer:

Yes?

Explanation:

is this a true or false question

if so I think yes but idk

8 0

3 years ago

In economics, we cannot accurately predict what individuals will do, but only what people in general will do. Why?

Dima020 [189]

Create something to make money of off

6 0

4 years ago

A financial institution has entered into an interest rate swap with company X. Under the terms of the swap, it receives 10% per

sergij07 [2.7K]

Answer:

The loss of the financial institution is $413,000

Explanation:

Let's say that after 3 years the financial institution will receive:

0.5 * 10% of $10million

= 0.5 * 0.1 * 10000000

= $500,000

Then, they will pay 0.5 * 9% of $10M

= 0.5 * 0.09 * 10000000

= $450,000

Therefore, their immediate loss would be $500000 - $450000

= $50000.

Let's assume that forward rates are realized to value the rest of the swap.

The forward rates = 8% per annum.

Therefore, the remaining cash flows are assumed that floating payment is

0.5*0.08*10000000 =

$400,000

Received net payment would be:

500,000-400,000= $100,000. The total cost of default is therefore the cost of foregoing the following cash flows:

Year 3=$50,000

Year 3.5=$100,000

Year 4 = $100,000

Year 4.5= $100,000

Year 5 = $100,000

Discounting these cash flows to year 3 at 4% per six months, the cost of default would be $413,000

4 0

3 years ago

Because she beat her goal this year by nearly 30 percent, lori has been telling everyone in the sales department of her incredib

yarga [219]

Lori is exhibiting a type of bias that is well-known as self-serving bias.

Self-serving bias is defined as <u>distortion in perceptual processes due to the need to maintain and enhance the person’s self-esteem – also known as a person’s tendency to see themselves in a favorable manner</u>. In the case of Lori, when she cannot reach her goal, she blames the poor economy, but when she managed to do it, she attributed it to her skills as a salesperson.

7 0

3 years ago