The correct answer is true. It is because if the contract
term is likely ambiguous, the court will likely consider this as an extrinsic
evidence or that the ambiguity is likely to be interpreted against the party
who is responsible for drafting the term.
Answer:
The Correct answer is "Because it supplies a higher quantity of output than a single price monopolist"
Explanation:
A cost segregating monopolist charges distinctive cost to various gathering of shoppers based on their capacity to pay, which empower it to create higher amount than a non-separating monopolist. Since it supplies a higher amount of yield than a solitary value monopolist.
Answer:
Explanation:
Dividends through year 1 to 5:
D1 = 2.15*(1+0.30)^1 = 2.80
D2 = 2.15*(1+0.30)^2 = 3.63
D3 = 2.15*(1+0.30)^2 * (1+0.18)^1 = 4.29
D4 = 2.15*(1+0.30)^2 * (1+0.18)^2 = 8.58
D5 = 2.15*(1+0.30)^2 * (1+0.18)^3 = 12.86
PV (D1) = 2.80
PV (D2) = 3.63 *PVIF = 3.63 * 0.87719 = 3.19
PV (D3) = 4.29 * 0.76947 = 3.30
PV (D4) = 8.58 * 0.67497 = 5.79
PV (D5) = 12.86 * 0.59208 = 7.62
Total of all PV's = 22.69
Answer:
A. Increase liabilities (Accounts payable) by $337.8 million
Explanation:
The journal entry will be: Inventory (Credit - Increased) 337,860,000 and Accounts payable (Debit - Increased) 337,860,000.
The company must recognize the increase in the Inventory and the medium of payment (Accounts payable).
B is false because this operationn can also be a decrease in cash, but the amount in the operation is too high for this payment medium.
C is false because, the inventory is not sold, and COSG will be increased when the goods are sold.
D is also false because the inventory is increasing, not decreasing.
Answer:
DR Cash $589
DR Credit Card expense $31
CR Sales $620
<em>(To record sales via credit card)</em>
<u>Working</u>
Cash
= 620 * ( 1 - 5%)
= $589
Credit Card Expense
= 620 * 5%
= $31
