2.50$ is the better deal. If you times 0.70$ to 5 it is 3.5$ which is more expensive
9514 1404 393
Answer:
no feasible solutions
Step-by-step explanation:
There are so many inequalities that determining the area covered by all 5 of them is problematic. Hence, we have reversed all of them in the attached graph, so any feasible solution region would remain white. Alas, there is no such region.
This system of inequalities has <em>no feasible solution</em>.
Answer: Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
When using the distributive property, 6(2x + 4) becomes 12x + 24
6 * 2x = 12x and 6 * 4 = 24
12x + 24 = 12x + 24
Therefore, the expressions are equivalent.
<h3>
Answer: 8/25</h3>
=======================================================
Explanation:
In a standard deck, there are 52 cards.
If this deck is missing the queen of hearts and 2 of clubs, then we really have 52-2 = 50 cards in the deck.
There are 4 aces and 13 spades. Those values add to 4+13 = 17, but we need to subtract off 1 to account for the ace of spades counted twice. We have 17-1 = 16 cards that are either an ace, a spade, or both.
Or you can think of it like saying 13 spades + 1 ace of hearts + 1 ace of diamonds + 1 ace of clubs = 16 cards total.
-----------------
The event space has A = 16 cards in it, while the sample space has B = 50 cards.
The probability we're after is A/B = 16/50 = 8/25
