11) However, because it is contradicting their previous statement
12) Although
13) In addition, because she's adding more to her statement
14) nevertheless, because she is saying that although the picnic was wet, it was fun anyway
15) moreover
16) similarly, because it is comparing the two
<span>c^2 + 5c - 14 = 0 </span>
<span>(c-2)(c+7) = 0 </span>
<span>c-2 = 0 or c+7 = 0 </span>
<span>c = 2 or c = -7 </span>
<span>c^2 - 2c - 15 = 0 </span>
<span>(c-5)(c+3) = 0 </span>
<span>c-5 = 0 or c+3 = 0 </span>
<span>c = 5 or c = -3</span>
In the plans of a proof, you should SOMETIMES used the plan that was used on previous theorems
If we keep using the plan that used in previous theorems, the knowledge that revolve around the mankind will not be developed as it is today
hope this helps<span />
Answer:
no because complementary angles equal 90 degrees and supplementary angles equal 180 degrees
Step-by-step explanation:
For number one, you are looking for how many multiplication equations can equal the number given. For example,
C) 12: 1, 12, 6, 2, 3, 4,
For number 2, composite numbers are numbers that are products of two smaller numbers.
For example, 30=15x2, so it is composite. Try dividing the numbers to see if they are composite.
For number 3,
a) two factors: 5 (1, 5)
b) four factors: 15 (1, 15, 3, 5)
c) five factors: 20 (1, 2, 4, 5, 20)
