Thankfully this is not true. But here me out. the rain falls on the just and the unjust right? I don't see a cone of light following a virtuous person right in the middle of a rainstorm. By thankfully, i mean we all are wrong. We all do things that we regret, or that we know are wrong, and even some things that we don't know are wrong.
Also, I'm not sure how ruling badly brings a bad name on your ancestors, but if someone said, "Bro, you are ruling awfully man. Your ancestors must've been messed up," then i can see why you could say this. ;), Since you decide what you do, your ancestors probably won't get a bad rep. Your ancestors really don't care at this point what you do. Where they are is not affected by what you do.
If you strive do what is right and honor God, you will indeed be blessed by Him, but there will always be a group that complains or argues to get themselves what they want.
Hope this helped!
In England, the doctrine that allowed the courts to hold protective jurisdiction over all children was called parents patriae.
<span>Pennsylvania! :D I hope this helps!! :D P.S I would love that brainist Answer! </span>
Most Southerners believed they were naturally better than African Americans and therefore had the right to "own" them, while many Northerners thought it was morally wrong, but some Northerners didn't want the competition of enslaved labor.
Answer:
See explanation
Explanation:
(Note: This answer is subjective)
In comparing the motives of the crusades to the motives of the Unites States' foreign policy in the Middle East today, you could say the motivations are similar if you hold the belief that the crusades were motivated not just by religious zeal, but by a desire for cultural and regional hegemony that would lead to economic gain. In terms of tactics, further going off the idea that the crusades were motivated by more than simple piety, a parallel can be drawn between the crusades and the US's involvement in the MidEast through their use of a moral belief, in the case of the crusades the need to spread Catholocism, in the case of the US's involvement in the Middle East the need to spread democracy, to disguise a more "nefarious" motive, like a desire for cultural/regional hegemony or economic gain.
