1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sergeinik [125]
3 years ago
15

What are some examples of types of investments on the part of manufacturers that result in growth? (b) how does this help improv

e a nations standard of living?
Social Studies
2 answers:
ololo11 [35]3 years ago
8 0

Research and Development (R&D) investments are the best example. Dedicating money to research, would enable companies to improve their physical capital (machines, facilities), and/or procedures. It is the way that manufacturing companies need to follow to enhance their productivity, and hence produce more competitive goods which will bring higher profits to the company.

  • Higher investment levels increase GDP (Gross Domestic Product) figures and lead to economic growh <em>(ceteris paribus).</em>
  • Higher profit may also lead to hiring more staff in the company. Hence, less people is unemployed in the economy, they are actually earning a salary now with which they can increase their demand of good or services in the markets. When demads increases, GDP does too, and hence there is economic growth <em>(ceteris paribus).</em>

Economic growth is considered as one of the engines that improve living standards within a country.

*<em>ceteris paribus is a Latin phrase which literally means "other things equal". </em>

ehidna [41]3 years ago
4 0

The example of types of investments on the part of manufacturers that result in growth is research and development. The result of research and development may improve the nations' standard of living. 

 

EXPLANATION

“Research and development” are the type of investment that can be made to improve nations standard of living. Research and development are known as innovative activities that are taken by governments or companies to develop new products, new services, or improve existing products into better products. Research and development constitute the development of the potential of finding new product and service for a better standard of living.

 

Research and development will differ from one institution to another institution. There are two kinds of primary models in research and development. The first one is actually tasked with developing new products or services, and the second one is tasked with research in scientific or technological fields for the purpose to facilitate future product development.  

 

Research and development can differ from the vast majority of corporate activities, from a not intended one into yield immediate profit. Generally, research and development will have a greater risk and uncertain return on investment. Nevertheless, "research and development" are still important for the purpose of finding a better standard of living through new products and services.

 

Research and development have two main purposes, which is to create new products and to create a feature for the existing ones. Investing in research and development might be a good investment for the government so they will better up things through the result of research and development. Therefore, at the end, it will improve nations standard of living.

LEARN MORE

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:

Etnographic research: brainly.com/question/8699485  

Researchers can obtain data from school: brainly.com/question/5157597  

KEYWORD: investments, manufactures, research and development

Subject: Social studies

Class: 10-12

Subchapter: Investments

You might be interested in
Which outcomes did the end of the Vietnam War have? Select all that apply.
Ede4ka [16]




The War We Could Have Won


Continue reading the main storyShare This Page

WASHINGTON - THE Vietnam War is universally regarded as a disaster for what it did to the American and Vietnamese people. However, 30 years after the war's end, the reasons for its outcome remain a matter of dispute.

The most popular explanation among historians and journalists is that the defeat was a result of American policy makers' cold-war-driven misunderstanding of North Vietnam's leaders as dangerous Communists. In truth, they argue, we were fighting a nationalist movement with great popular support. In this view, "our side," South Vietnam, was a creation of foreigners and led by a corrupt urban elite with no popular roots. Hence it could never prevail, not even with a half-million American troops, making the war "unwinnable."

This simple explanation is repudiated by powerful historical evidence, both old and new. Its proponents mistakenly base their conclusions on the situation in Vietnam during the 1950's and early 1960's and ignore the changing course of the war (notably, the increasing success of President Richard Nixon's Vietnamization strategy) and the evolution of South Vietnamese society (in particular the introduction of agrarian reforms).

For all the claims of popular support for the Vietcong insurgency, far more South Vietnamese peasants fought on the side of Saigon than on the side of Hanoi. The Vietcong were basically defeated by the beginning of 1972, which is why the North Vietnamese launched a huge conventional offensive at the end of March that year. During the Easter Offensive of 1972 -- at the time the biggest campaign of the war -- the South Vietnamese Army was able to hold onto every one of the 44 provincial capitals except Quang Tri, which it regained a few months later. The South Vietnamese relied on American air support during that offensive.

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story

If the United States had provided that level of support in 1975, when South Vietnam collapsed in the face of another North Vietnamese offensive, the outcome might have been at least the same as in 1972. But intense lobbying of Congress by the antiwar movement, especially in the context of the Watergate scandal, helped to drive cutbacks of American aid in 1974. Combined with the impact of the world oil crisis and inflation of 1973-74, the results were devastating for the south. As the triumphant North Vietnamese commander, Gen. Van Tien Dung, wrote later, President Nguyen Van Thieu of South Vietnam was forced to fight "a poor man's war."






Even Hanoi's main patron, the Soviet Union, was convinced that a North Vietnamese military victory was highly unlikely. Evidence from Soviet Communist Party archives suggests that, until 1974, Soviet military intelligence analysts and diplomats never believed that the North Vietnamese would be victorious on the battlefield. Only political and diplomatic efforts could succeed. Moscow thought that the South Vietnamese government was strong enough to defend itself with a continuation of American logistical support. The former Soviet chargé d'affaires in Hanoi during the 1970's told me in Moscow in late 1993 that if one looked at the balance of forces, one could not predict that the South would be defeated. Until 1975, Moscow was not only impressed by American military power and political will, it also clearly had no desire to go to war with the United States over Vietnam. But after 1975, Soviet fear of the United States dissipated.


U.S. troops withdrew from the country. this is answer


6 0
3 years ago
The Democratic Republican Party was based on the idea that the central government of a country should be?
Lena [83]

Answer:

Limited....................

6 0
3 years ago
Which event completes this timeline PLEASE HELP!
aleksandrvk [35]

D. George Washington is elected president.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
________ describes the degree to which a play addresses both of-the-moment and timeless audience concerns.
mixas84 [53]

Answer: Pertinent

Explanation:

Pertinent describes the degree to which a play addresses both of-the-moment and timeless audience concerns. That meeans relevant or applicable to the particular matter.

8 0
3 years ago
a. Why did the Continental congress make federal government weak when it drew up articles of Confederation?
Talja [164]
To summarize this, they were afraid. During that time, we had just managed to successfully leave the British government, and the whole reason we declared independence was because of an all-powerful king who controlled our lives through massive taxation, without listening to anything we said. We had developed a fear of a strong, central government like the British, so we did as much as we could to weaken our new government, even abolishing federal taxes, which meant no federal military or funding for anything like education, health, or safety at the federal level.<span />
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In the united states, what occupation holds the greatest prestige?
    11·1 answer
  • What do psychologists call disorders that are found only in particular cultures?
    12·1 answer
  • There are 4 basic criteria for segmenting markets. Identify and explain each.
    12·1 answer
  • Choose which items are a basic part of Buddhist beliefs.
    7·2 answers
  • What was the major turning point in Moses’ life?
    8·1 answer
  • How many holocaust survivors are still alive 2017?
    14·1 answer
  • True or false: The New Deal led to the end of the Great Depression
    8·1 answer
  • On the map the circles triangles and squares are all of examples of ______
    8·1 answer
  • Describe how buying on credit and installment plans work and why they can be dangerous to an economy.
    6·1 answer
  • And exchange for cheap land settlers in Texas were required to do what by the Mexican government
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!