Answer:
Proposal A
3.75 years
Proposal B
3.375 years
Explanation:
<u>Proposal A</u>
Payback = 3.75 years
Year Cash Inflow Initial Investment Balance Year Count
0 0 1,050,000
1 $280,000 770,000 1
2 $280,000 490,000 2
3 $280,000 210,000 3
4 $280,000 0 *3.75
* 1050,0000 / 280,000 = 3.75 years
<u>Proposal B</u>
Payback = 3.375 years
Year Cash Inflow Initial Investment Balance Year Count
0 0 1,050,000
1 $350,000 700,000 1
2 $3150,000 385,000 2
3 $280,000 105,000 3
4 $280,000 0 *3.375
* ( 3 + ( 105,000 / 280,000 ) ) = 3.75 years
Answer:
A. The government lowers tax rates and undertakes a replacement of old bridges and roads
B. The government lowers tax rates and issues a partial refund of taxes that have already been paid
These 2 statements are correct explained below
Explanation:
A. The government lowers tax rates and undertakes a replacement of old bridges and roads, this statement is correct because when the government lowers tax rates it means that people have higher disposable income on their hands therefore they can spend more which increases demand, and people also invest more which increases supply, also the replacement of bridges and roads is improvement in infrastructure and this also increases supply as transportation is easier and cheaper for businesses.
B. The government lowers tax rates and issues a partial refund of taxes that have already been paid, this statement is correct because when the government lowers tax rates it means that people have higher disposable income on their hands therefore they can spend more which increases demand, and people also invest more which increases supply, also refund of taxes will increase the disposable money that people have so they can invest and consume both which will increase both supply and demand.
C. The government raises tax rates and reduces unemployment insurance payment
This is contraction fiscal policy and will do the opposite of expansionary fiscal policy, that is why this statement is incorrect.
D. The Federal Reserve increases the money supply and lowers the interest rate while the government simultaneously reduces future taxes. This statement is wrong because lowering the interest rate is an expansionary monetary policy and not an expansionary fiscal policy.
Answer:
$953 per unit
Explanation:
For computing the average cost per unit first we have to determine the operating capacity at 85% after that the total cost which is shown below:
Operating capacity at 85% is
= 300 computers × 85%
= 255 computers
Now the total cost is
= Variable cost + Fixed cost
where,
Variable cost is
= $660 × 255 computers
= $168,300
And, the fixed cost is $74,700
So, the total cost is
= $168,300 + $74,700
= $243,000
Now the average cost per unit is
= $243,000 ÷ 255 computers
= $953 per unit
Answer:
Your answer is going to be c.
Explanation:
as soap is meant to wash away germs it has to first kill them.
<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
The implicit cost of capital
Implicit cost of capital is the opportunity cost of capital which is already incurred but not reported as a separate cost/expense, Implicit cost is the cost which results from using an existing asset instead of selling or renting it.
For example when a businessman uses his/her existing land which has implicit cost of say $1000 per month but bought it for say $100 many years ago, so $1000 is its implicit cost/current market rent per month which is equal to its oppo
