The Stamp Act of 1765 was the act passed by the British government that stated that the colonists had to pay tax on all printed materials. It is also the first internal tax charged on American colonists by the British government. The act arrived at a time when debt from the Seven Years’ War was one of the British Empire’s problem and it was thought up that North American colonies could be a source of revenue.
Not every conflict in the world has involved armed conflict. is the answer
Answer:
B: Through military campaigns and alliances, he unified Mesopotamia under one ruler.
Explanation:
Hammurabi conquered Elam and also the city-states of Larsa, Mari, and Eshnunna. He managed to dethrone the king of Assyria Ishme-Dagan I, and also made his son to pay tribute. This was the time when he successfully brought the entire Mesopotamia under one ruler. Mesopotamia was now under Babylonian rule. Moreover, he also introduced the Code of Hammurabi which received from the Babylonian god of justice. The code offer no compensation for committing heinous crimes.
This is called the president's inauguration or oath. Please let me know if you need any further help. Kindest Regards
<span>The Supreme Court is most likely to be accused of judicial activism in cases involving: protection of individual rights.
Writing for the conservative group, <em>The Heritage Foundation</em>, Elizabeth Slattery defines judicial activism as "w</span><span>hen judges fail to apply the Constitution or laws impartially according to their original public meaning, regardless of the outcome, or do not follow binding precedent of a higher court and instead decide the case based on personal preference."
Cases involving individual rights are likely to elicit charges of judicial activism because the Constitution does not spell out each and every sort of right citizens may have. New questions come up that were not considered or specified at the time the Constitution was written. For instance, <em>Roe v. Wade </em>(1973) addressed the question of abortion and an individual's right to privacy. <em>Obergefell v. Hodges </em>(2015) addressed the legality of same-sex marriage. Both are cases of individual rights, where the Constitution did not give direct instruction on the issues at stake. The decisions on those issues, to allow abortion and to allow same-sex marriage, both are criticized by conservatives as instances of judicial activism.</span>
