The area on S1 associated with the thumb is as large as the area for the forearm. This is an example of cortical magnification.
Cortical magnification refers to the fact that the number of neurons in the visual cortex accountable for processing the visible stimulus of a given length varies as a function of the place of the stimulus within the visual field.
Cortical magnification happens when a disproportionately large place on the cortex is activated via stimulation of a small region on the receptor surface. One instance of cortical magnification is the pretty huge area of the visual cortex which is activated by means of stimulation of the fovea. Cortical magnification describes what number of neurons in a place of the visual cortex is 'responsible' for processing a stimulus of a given size, as a function of the visual field location.
The magnification element of the retina is the linear extent of the visual striate cortex to which each degree of the retina projects. It has been recommended that the magnification factor is directly proportional to visible acuity, but the magnification factor measured in monkeys was compared with visible acuity in guys.
Learn more about neurons here brainly.com/question/13439505
#SPJ4
Dddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
Answer:
A contract, to be valid valid, must have determined the following requirements:
The consent of the contracting parties.
A specific object
A foundation or cause thereof.
The form of the contract, on the other hand, is sometimes only an essential requirement for that existence (principle of freedom of form). The law will expressly establish supposed stories; for example: contracts with real rights over real estate (sale of a flat, mortgage ...), marriage certificates (always in public deed), powers for lawsuits, etc.
The consent in the contracts
This occurs when the encounter between the offer and the acceptance of the contract occurs, as long as the contractors are clear they are the object and the cause of the contract. In this regard, let's analyze what to analyze two exceptional assumptions: mail and internet contracts. In the former, those held by letter, there is no consent until the offeror knows the acceptance or until, being able to know it, decide not to do so, in the absence of good contractual faith. Let's look at an example: if the one who made the offer refuses to open the letter that presumably will contain the acceptance, it is understood that there is mutual consent to conclude the contract.
D) cognitive, solving puzzles develops those skills