Answer: True
Explanation: The Supreme Court admitted that it is haphazard to treat similar things differently and that mandatory death penalty statutes eliminated this problem, but also reckless to treat two different things the same way. In essence, to impose the same penalty on all convicted murderers, even though all defendants
are different, is just as capricious as imposing a penalty randomly.
To relieve this problem, some sentencing guidelines became necessary. This gave rise to the guided discretion statutes that set standards for juries and judges to
use when deciding whether to impose the death penalty. The Court reasoned that, guided discretion statutes struck a reasonable balance between giving the jury some discretion and allowing it to consider the defendant's background and character and the circumstances surrounding the crime.
<span>It's all speculation, but I'm going with B because she was a woman. Not just for social reasons, but because women didn't pose a political threat back then.</span>
<span>c. proves our expertise </span>
Answer: "ethnocentrism" .
______________________________________________________
Answer:
Jimmy Carter in 1976.
Explanation:
The last time Texas voted for a Democratic presidential candidate in 1976, when Jimmy Carter won 51.14% of the popular vote. The victory of the Democratic party happened in Texas because the majority of the voters turned out to be Hispanic. Texas people also gave their vote to Carter who held strong anti-Republican sentiment following the Watergate scandal (Richard Nixon Presidency). Carter was able to beat He also beat his opponent nominee Gerald Ford in the general election.