1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pavlova-9 [17]
3 years ago
9

It is common for supermarkets to carry both generic (store-label) and brand-name (producer-label) varieties of sugar and other p

roducts. Many consumers view these products as perfect substitutes, meaning that consumers are always willing to substitute a constant proportion of the store brand for the producer brand. Consider a consumer who is always willing to substitute four pounds of a generic store-brand sugar for two pounds of a brand-name sugar. Do these preferences exhibit a diminishing marginal rate of substitution between store-brand and producer-brand sugar.
Required:
a. Do these preferences exhibit a diminishing marginal rate of substitution? Assume that this consumer has $24 of income to spend on sugar, and the price of store-brand sugar is $1 per pound and the price of producer-brand sugar is $3 per pound.
b. How much of each type of sugar will be purchased?
c. How would your answer change if the price of store-brand sugar was $2 per pound and the price of producer-brand sugar was $3 per pound?
Business
1 answer:
dsp733 years ago
8 0

Answer:

a. Do these preferences exhibit a diminishing marginal rate of substitution?

  • no, because the consumer is actually purchasing a higher amount of goods, the only difference is that they are paying a lower price.

Assume that this consumer has $24 of income to spend on sugar, and the price of store-brand sugar is $1 per pound and the price of producer-brand sugar is $3 per pound.

  • The consumer will purchase 24 pounds of price of store sugar simply because the price is much lower, not because he/she wants to consume less. Actually a lower price might result in an increase of consumption.

b. How much of each type of sugar will be purchased?

  • If the consumer is willing to spend the whole $24 on sugar, he/she will purchase 24 pounds of store brand sugar. The alternative is to buy 8 pounds of producer brand sugar, and that is not a good deal.

c. How would your answer change if the price of store-brand sugar was $2 per pound and the price of producer-brand sugar was $3 per pound?

  • The consumer would purchase 12 pounds of store brand sugar instead of 24, but he/she will still not purchase producer brand sugar since the difference in price is still too high. Remember that consumers view both types of sugar as perfect substitutes, so they will purchase the brand with the lower price.
You might be interested in
What are two main reasons for having a savings account
Sonbull [250]

Answer:

to start building wealth

and for easy accessibility (emergency funds are there)

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ralph Lauren: Accounts receivable turnover and number of days' sales in receivables Ralph Lauren Corporation designs, markets, a
SVETLANKA909090 [29]

<em>MISSING INFORMATION:</em>

   concept                     //    Year 2     //     Year 1

Sales                                     7,620             7,450

Account Receivables             655                588

Answer:

Yes, there is. The days to collect increase by 4.16 to 29.77 from 26.61

Which is a bad sing as the company delays more to collect form their customers

Explanation:

Account Receivable turnover:

Average receivable:

(458 + 588 ) / 2  =  523

7,450 / 523 =   14.25

Days to collect: 365 / 14.25 = 25,61

Second Year:

Average receivable: (655 + 588) / 2 = 621.5

Turnover: 7,620 / 621.5 =  12.26

Days to collect: 365 / 12.26 = 29,77

29.77 - 25.61 = 4.16

6 0
2 years ago
he long-run average total cost of producing 100 units of output is $4, while the long-run average cost of producing 110 units of
Firlakuza [10]

Answer:

Constant Return to Scale

Explanation:

Based on the information given the numbers

suggest that between 100 and 110 units of output, the firm producing this output has CONSTANT RETURN TO SCALE.

Constant Return to Scale occurs in a situation where the proportional increase in all the inputs is as well equal to the proportional increase in output which means the returns to scale are constant , which is why RETURNS TO SCALE help to describe all what happens to long run returns when the scale of production increases.

Therefore Constant returns to scale often occur when the output increase in exactly the same way or the same proportion as the factors of production.

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is not a business management perspective that goes beyond the numbers to enable intelligent planning, con
lana [24]
<h2>Lean Production Perspective</h2>

Explanation:

There are 6 Business management perspective. They are:

  1. An ethics perspective
  2. Strategic management perspective
  3. Enterprise risk management
  4. Corporate social responsibility perspective
  5. A process management perspective
  6. A leadership perspective

Here the Lean production perspective does not come under the business management perspective.

Lean production actually deals with cutting down of waste and whilst ensuring quality. This approach is basically a cost-cutting approach where it brings benefit to the business. This is one of the most efficient methods.

4 0
2 years ago
Market researchers often report discretionary income. Discretionary income is your disposable income minus your fixed expenses.
SOVA2 [1]

The percentage of the disposable income that is discretionary is equal to 30.82% if the amount left after fixed expenses is $900.

As the amount left after payment of the fixed expenses is $900, this is said to be the discretionary income because discretionary income is equal to the disposable income minus fixed expenses.

Now we can calculate the percentage of disposable income that is discretionary as follows;

percentage of disposable income that is discretionary = (discretionary income ÷ disposable income) × 100

% discretionary income = (900 ÷ 2,920) × 100

% discretionary income = 90,000 ÷ 2,920

% discretionary income = 30.82%

Hence, 30.82% of the disposable income is calculated to be discretionary if the disposable income is $2,920 and the amount left after payment of fixed expenses is $900.

To learn more about discretionary income, click here:

brainly.com/question/15814704

#SPJ4

3 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Overcharging Medicare for care and services provided to patients is an example of Behavior
    8·1 answer
  • What would be the journal entry for each of the listed transactions? For each transaction, how Cedar Fair’s assets, liabilities,
    7·1 answer
  • Suppose player 2 can choose its strategy before player 1, that player 1 observes player 2's choice before making her decision, a
    11·1 answer
  • Printers Company pays a $25,000 annual membership fee to a trade association for paper wholesalers. The trade association estima
    15·1 answer
  • Wells Technical Institute (WTI), a school owned by Tristana Wells, provides training to individuals who pay tuition directly to
    9·1 answer
  • Three soft skills i need an answer
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following describes a move away from capitalism?
    8·1 answer
  • San Mateo Company had the following account balances at December 31, 2018, before recording bad debt expense for the year: Accou
    12·1 answer
  • question content area in recording the cost of goods sold for cash, based on data available from perpetual inventory records, th
    10·1 answer
  • If a building has 18,000 square feet of useable space and 2,000 square feet of common area, the rentable/useable factor would be
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!