Answer: Irrational Hope this helps, please consider making me Brainliest.
Step-by-step explanation:
That number is irrational because it cannot be directly expressed with two integers. Hope this helps, please consider making me Brainliest.
Answer:as likely as not
Step-by-step explanation:
To find w, you subtract 117 from 180. After that you get w = 63. Now you add 63 and 31 to get 94. You then subtract 94 from 180 to get x = 86. Now you add 86 and 56 to get 142. You then subtract 142 from 180 to get y = 38. Now you add 38 and 117 to get 155. Again you subtract 155 from 180 to get z = 25
So here are the answers for the given questions above:
1. Based on the given values above, the correct answer would be option B. NEITHER ARITHMETIC NOR GEOMETRIC. Why? When we say arithmetic sequence, the values should have a common difference which remains constant all throughout the sequence, and this sequence does not qualify. On the other hand, a geometric sequence should have a common ratio, and these numbers do not have one.
2. The correct answer for this problem would be option C. <span>121,520.
Based on the given values above, the values have a common ratio of 1.1. So what we are going to do is just to multiply 1.1 each time and by 2016, we will get </span>121,520.
Hope these answers help.
Answer:
The anser is 5 hop this helps sorry if it is wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
