Jill And Jamahl are comparing their favorite number.Jill number has a prime factorization of 6 number. Jamahl has a prime factor ization of 3 numbers.Jill say this means her number is greater than Jamahl. Jamahl say that not necessarily true. Who's correct?
1 answer:
To prove that jill is wrong we just need an example of this; 2*3*5*7*11*13 = 30030 (this is the smallest number with 6 different prime numbers) 5953*5981*5987 = 2.13x10^11 (which is obviously a much bigger number)this is enough to prove that jill is wrong
You might be interested in
162/(6(7-4)^2) pemdas parenthasees inner first so 7-4 is forst 7-4=3 162/(6(3)^2) then exponents 3^2=9 162/(6(9)) multiplication 6 times 9=54 162/(54)=3
The answer is given by the empirical rule, 68%.
The pattern is to divide by 3 486 ÷ 3 = 162 162 ÷ 3 = 54 54 ÷ 3 = 18 18 ÷ 3 = 6The next number is 6
It’s either B or D. I’m sorry I’m not so sure but I think it’s either one of those.
Answer:
your answer will be B
Step-by-step explanation:
have a nice day/night !!!