Answer:
The correct answer is D. Credibility.
Explanation:
Thomas violated the credibility of his studies, because he omitted the error which caused a false expected result.
Credibility is that characteristic of certain things that make them credible, we talk about situations, verses or estimates of a certain presence. When we say that we observe the credibility of something we are making a measurement of what is credible and not facing a series of examples in order to make a comparison in this regard.
Answer: Option B
Explanation: In simple words, acceptance speech refers to the speech that is made by an individual generally after receiving award or similar honor as such.
In such a speech the receiving party shows gratitude and tries to connect with their audience by showing sentiments and proud of receiving the award. These speeches are usually very brief and to the point but sometimes an extension is made by the deceiving party, stating some past events or making motivational statements to the audience.
In the given case, Carlos revived the award and thanked the school authority. Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct option is B.
Answer:
"CBAs" would be the appropriate answer.
Explanation:
- The CBAs system was intended to incorporate various business practices and knowledge across multiple security experts as well as provide a structured process to match application development policies and procedures with either the institution's threat analysis.
- As either a consequence, a structure is developed to enhance their safety infrastructure of business process development.
Answer:The answer is a
Explanation:
A contract is an agreement between two or more parties which contains the terms and conditions of the contract and which also serve as an evidence that the two parties in the contract has a duty to perform to each other. The terms and conditions of the contract can be enforced in the court of law in case of a breach of contract which may come from either parties in the contract agreement. While, a contract interference is a kind of breach of contract in which one vendor put a pressure on the organization in which they offer service to withdraw from the contract the organization earlier had with one of their competitors in the market. This contract interference can occur when a vendor either force or put a financial inducement on the organization with a view to make them consider their proposal to the organization to eventually agree to abandon the contract they had with their competitors in favour of getting the contract instead of their competitors who should get the contract.
Therefore, from what we can deduce from the question under review, it is clear that A plus linen has engage in contract interference by offering John C Lincoin hospital $5 for every 100 pound of linen they send to them by dropping their current linen service.
