Answer:
$60
Explanation:
According to information on your question. We are to note that an absence or reduction of suppliers could lead to lower supply.
As in this case, the producer supply loss of $60 was incurred as some sellers dropped out of the market as a result of the tax.
Answer:
<u>The target cost per iron= $83.25</u>
Explanation:
Profit Required = Required Investment * required rate of return
= $ 3,500,000*15%
= $ 525,000
Sales= 300000*85=$25,500,000.00
Less: profit required=$525,000.00
Cost= Sales- Profit
Cost=24,975,000.00
Per Unit Target Cost = Total Cost / Total Units
= $ 24,975,000/ 300,000
= $ 83.25
Answer: Depreciate
Explanation:
The Economist is a widely respected financial and economic magazine which means that their articles can cause movements in the market especially when backed up by analysts.
The Economist believes that the Tunisian Dinar will rise relative to the Peruvian Sol, this means that the Peruvian Sol will depreciate against the Tunisian Diner. Some people and entities holding Peruvian Sol assets will try to offload it so that they do not suffer losses.
This increase in supply and reduction in demand for the Peruvian Sol will lead to it depreciating.
Answer:
Opportunity cost
Explanation:
A country is said to have a comparative advantage in producing a good, if it has a lower opportunity cost of producing that good in comparison to the other country. For instance if the opportunity cost of producing Wheat in U.S is 2. While that in China is 1. It shows that China has a comparative advantage in producing wheat as compared to the U.S.
So a nation that has a comparative advantage in producing a good or service compared to the other nation can produce that good or service with a lower opportunity cost.
Efficiency, Profit and Resource cost are not directly related to comparative advantage. Although efficiency can contribute towards lower opportunity cost but it is not a scale used for international trade.
Thus, lower opportunity cost is the best alternative.
