Answer:
60.59
Step-by-step explanation:
73%=0.73
0.73*83=60.59
The answer you're looking for will be,
ANSWER: 3x(x + 2)(x - 2)
You're welcome.
STEPS:
#1. Factor out common term 3x.
The equivalent expression for [gofoh](9) is 5(32(9)^5-1).
According to the given question.
We have three functions
f(x) = x^5 - 1
g(x) = 5x^2
h(x) = 2x
Here, we have to find the equivalent expression for [gofoh](9).
so,
gofoh(x)
= g((2x)^5 -1)
= g(32x^5 -1)
= 5(32x^5 -1)
Therefore,
gofoh(9)
= 5(32(9)^5-1)
Hence, the equivalent expression for [gofoh](9) is 5(32(9)^5-1).
Find out more information about equiavlent expression here:
brainly.com/question/28170201
#SPJ4
3x-x+2=4
<span>P = t + r + s
P - r - s = t + r - r + s - s
P - r - s = t</span>
Yes it is true that commercial truck owners violate laws requiring front license plates at a higher rate than owners of passenger cars because null hypothesis is rejected.
Given among 2049 Connecticut passenger cars, 239 had only rear license plates. Among 334 Connecticut trucks, 45 had only rear license plates.
let
be the probability that commercial cars have rear license plates and
be the probability that connected trucks have rear license plates.
Cars Trucks Total
Total 2049 334 2383
x 239 45 284
p 0.1166 0.1347 0.1191
α=0.05
Hypothesis will be :


It is a left tailed test at 0.05 significance.
Standard errors of p=
=
=
=0.0066
Test statistic Z=p difference/standard error
=(0.1166-0.1347)/0.0066
=-0.0181/0.0061
=-2.967
p value=0.001505<5%
Since p is less than 5% we reject null hypothesis.
We cannot calculate standard deviation so we cannot calculate confidence interval.
Hence there is statistical evidence at 5% significance level to support that commercial truck owners violate laws requiring front license plates at a higher rate than owners of passenger cars.
Learn more about z test at brainly.com/question/14453510
#SPJ4