Answer: The answer is provided below
Explanation:
The four liabilities of incoming and outgoing partners are:
1. person who is admitted as a partner to an existing firm apart from a limited partnership or an incorporated limited partnership doesn't by that particular admission alone become liable for anything which is done before the person becomes a partner.
2. A person admitted as a general partner into a limited partnership or an incorporated limited partnership that already exists does not by the admission alone become liable for things done before the individual became a general partner.
3. A partner who retires from a firm other than limited partnership or an incorporated limited partnership doesn't by the retirement alone cease to be liable for the partnership debts and the obligations that were incurred before the retirement of the partner.
4. A partner who retires from a limited partnership or an incorporated limited partnership
doesn't by the retirement alone cease to be liable for the liabilities of the firm that were incurred before the retirement of the partner for which the partner were liable.
Answer:
Language
Watch
Edit
Lila Ram Sangwan (30 November 1930 – 11 October 2003) was an Indian wrestler from Charkhi Dadri district of Haryana, who was the first Indian to win a gold medal in the Commonwealth Games. He won gold medal in the heavyweight (100 kg) category in the 1958 British Empire and Commonwealth Games. Lila Ram competed in the freestyle wrestling in heavyweight and super heavyweight categories at the national as well as international level.[4]
Answer:
Well, Holism is the idea that various systems should be viewed as wholes, consequentialism does not specify the desired outcome, while utilitarianism specifies good as the desired outcome. including Deontology which focuses on the rules, or the universal norms. Virtue ethics you can say someone is morally right only if his actions express a certain virtue.
Explanation:
What is Holism? How is it different from utilitarianism, consequentialism, Deontology, and virtue ethics?
Answer:
It is the duty of Congress to have hearings in order to confirm a Supreme Court Justice nominee (as stated in the Constitution). This exclusive power rests on the U.S. Senate. The consensus, however, may be different and may vote against a nominee. Political parties within the Senate generally get in the way of who will vote and who won't, and vice-versa.
Explanation:
For example, Merrick Garland (former President Obama's nominee) was not given a hearing. Furthermore, Congress failed to perform the duties to have a hearing and decide whether to vote or deny a nominee. This is an example of how they refused to even vote on him. This is not the way government should operate.
